What with Haiti

Bird Dog's picture

While doing my Ireland piece, I ran across an article on an Irish billionaire and his doings on the godforsaken one-third-of-an-island nation of Haiti. Since I haven't written much at all on the place for a while (the last diary here), I thought I'd do a whole thang on the subject.

Denis O’Brien, an impatient Irish billionaire who tends to make his points with a few choice profanities, is determined to change all that.

On a recent sunny morning, he presided over the opening of the 50th school that his vast telecommunications company, Digicel, has rebuilt since the quake struck in 2010 — and then he promptly pledged to build another 80 schools by 2014.

It kind of reminds me of the guy who wrote Three Cups of Tea and what he did in AfPak, except that O'Brien didn't make s**t up. The head of Digicel hasn't been completely altruistic about his investment in the Carribean nation, but it's fair to credit the guy for his investments and donations there. Also, O'Brien didn't infect half a million with cholera and kill 7,000. That was done by UN troops, those dirty Nepals. Other investors are stepping in.

Two years after the quake, there are still over a half million living in tent camps. The reasons for the slow pace of reconstruction are myriad. Bottom line, the housing situation still sucks, and Rolling Stone has called it a "disaster", despite Sean Penn's efforts. Out of $5 billion pledged, only around two-fifths have been funded. Being a real estate guy, I'd love to see the place get decent water, sewage disposal systems and land surveys, with some paved roads thrown in. Couldn't hurt.

In response to the situation, thousands of Haitians have migrated to Brazil and its 5.2% unemployment rate, thanks to Ecuador's flexible entry requirements, among other things. City dwellers are being coaxed into the countryside by a group of dogoodniks, which sounds like a good idea. Others are trying the boat-person route to Cuba and points beyond, which sounds like a bad idea. Other well-intentioned bleeding hearts are trying to restore Haiti one village at a time, which sounds like a good idea. The Venezuelan socialist wannabe dictator is sending fuel at discounted prices, which also sounds like a good idea, even though Hugo is having his own little housing shortage problem. The evil moneylenders at World Bank approved a $255 million package for one of Bill Clinton's NGOs to provide housing and improvement projects, and we'll see if that's a good idea.

Anyway, the status quo is little changed from pre-earthquake days, i.e., it's a badly governed, corrupt under-capitalized mess, chock-filled with destitute citizens and squalor. We'll see if Haitian lives move toward the better in 2012. Will things get better? I'm tepidly optimistic to mildly pessimistic that they will.

UPDATE: If you're a Haitian who's living in a Port au Prince hovel, what's the most effective way to turn your country around? Leave.

We need more rapid ways to get relief directly to disaster victims, including the hundreds of thousands still suffering in the aftermath of the Haiti quake.

Luckily, we already have one: migration. Immediately after the quake, about 200,000 Haitians living in the United States without proper documents were granted "temporary protected status," which allowed them to work -- and send money home -- without fear of deportation. That single step may be the greatest contribution America has made towards Haiti's reconstruction to date. That's because the 535,000 Haitian migrants in the United States send home money -- remittances -- worth as much as $2 billion a year. An early estimate by World Bank economist Dilip Ratha suggested that the temporary protected designation might have been worth as much as $360 million in additional remittances to Haiti in 2010 alone -- that's more than total U.S. aid disbursements to the country in 2010 and 2011.

Beyond being a powerful short-term recovery tool, migration is vital to the long-term development of Haiti as well.  Economist Michael Clemens, my colleague at the Center for Global Development, suggests that four out of five Haitians who have escaped destitution have done so by leaving the country. Meanwhile, the potential benefit of a diaspora for Haiti's future prospects have been repeatedly demonstrated: one need only look at Indians working in Silicon Valley who were key to creating Bangalore's booming IT industry or Africans spending time abroad who are responsible for creating new export industries back home.  Across countries, larger migrant populations lead to greater trade, investment, and learning.

In other words, Indian immigration to the U.S. put the "bang" in Bangalore, to quote a line from a certain movie. The benefits would be similar for Haiti, if the U.S. government would let more Haitians in and risk a little higher unemployment.


Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

Nice slander on the UN

HankP's picture

Yes, sewage infrastructure gets damaged in an earthquake. Of course, when the discussion about American Indians describes how many of them were killed, the standard excuse is that disease was to blame.

I blame it all on the Internet

Except there was no slander

Bird Dog's picture

As defined:

1. defamation; calumny: rumors full of slander.

2. a malicious, false, and defamatory statement or report: a slander against his good name.

3. Law . defamation by oral utterance rather than by writing, pictures, etc.

Since the evidence is fairly overwhelming and incontrovertible that Nepalese soldiers under the UN banner were responsible for the cholera outbreak, I would say that your assertion of slander is fairly libelous. And it's not unusual for soldiers wearing the UN blue helmets to misbehave.

Re the American Indians, the issue wasn't with the spread of disease, it was the unsupportable charge that the spread of disease was done deliberately.


"Transparency and the rule of law will be the touchstones of this presidency."

--Barack Obama, January 2009

Keep complaining about the blue helmets

HankP's picture

they stick around and help after everyone else has moved on. They may have unintentionally introduced disease, but you and your cites infer it was intentional or that they didn't care.

I blame it all on the Internet


Bird Dog's picture

Why do you keep misrepresenting and mischaracterizing?

One, pointing out that Nepali UN soldiers were responsible for infecting one-half million and killing 7,000 is not "complaining", it is pointing out these UN soldiers made life worse for a half million and indescribably worse for the 7,000 they killed. Such an event is usually considered newsworthy.

Two, there was only one cite and it was from The Guardian, a periodical which usually is simpatico to your left-wing, anti-capitalist socialist viewpoint. No assertion was made as to intent or motivation. It merely named who was responsible, and quite credibly.


"Transparency and the rule of law will be the touchstones of this presidency."

--Barack Obama, January 2009

It's simple

HankP's picture

you could have said "they accidentally infected" the victims. Instead you pivot to "UN troops behaving badly", as if that's unique to UN troops.

I blame it all on the Internet

Er, no

Bird Dog's picture

You made your false assertion before I said that. Why do you keep misrepresenting and mischaracterizing?

Oh, and I do consider it bad behavior for a group of guests in a traumatized nation to add to the trauma by infecting 500,000 and killing 7,000. It still doesn't go to intent or motivation.


"Transparency and the rule of law will be the touchstones of this presidency."

--Barack Obama, January 2009

Behaving badly?

mmghosh's picture

Its hard to control what's in your colon. The point is that the soldiers didn't have adequate sanitary facilities, the provision of which was the responsibility of the UN.  I'm partly with BD on this one, the UN has not provided an adequate standard of rehabilitation services.  If this had happened in Iraq, for example, with US troops, one could just imagine the response in the media.


The Gurkha troops with ISAF posed no such hazard - in other words the [url=http://waronterrornews.typepad.com/home/2011/08/gurkhas-forge-relationships-in-afghanistan.html]ISAF looked after their needs[/url].  I would imagine the Afghan population are also not exposed to the cholera bacillus, even if their resistance might be higher than New Worlders.

freedom is a fundamental value that does not need to be justified in terms of some other value like efficiency

As I said Manish

HankP's picture

it was after a huge earthquake. Infrastructure tends to get severely damaged in cases like that.


You may not have heard the dog whistle. Conservatives (especially the crazy ones) have been attacking the UN for decades over here.

I blame it all on the Internet

Two words. Mbaye Diagne refutes all anti-UN forces

mmghosh's picture

propaganda.  I believe he got quite a bit of recognition in USA, too.




But this is not to exculpate the UN for not being more careful.  7000 deaths is pretty horrific.  Like I said, if this had happened with the US forces in Iraq, we wouldn't have heard the end of recriminations.  Good intentions do not excuse bad practice.  I do plenty of charity work - its a big responsibility to do it responsibly - otherwise you shouldn't do it.  Naturally, UN rehab services should be better funded, and with better people.

freedom is a fundamental value that does not need to be justified in terms of some other value like efficiency

He may still think


the GOP is aligned with his political beliefs! Maybe he can swing them around into alignment!


Well, whatever. Again, I claim BD is a good writer. I read a lot of opinions on the internet, and his are laid out well, and written well. I think he must be a smart guy. But his writing still makes me shake my head...


edit: typos