Clinton's speech helps bring Democrats together (update: excerpts)

5

A truly moving, heartfelt, and gracious speech. Senator Clinton opened with stories of her supporters who have given so much to promote her campaign, then passionately called for support of Obama and laid out the reasons we need a Democrat in the White House: for boosting the economy, for reforming health care, for responsibly ending the war in Iraq. Finally, she looked back at how far women in US politics have come, and how her candidacy has helped make the path easier in the future for a woman to become President.

It's been a long and at times bitter primary, but it's also been a historic campaign and I'm proud to be a member of a party that has put forward such qualified and groundbreaking candidates for President.

Now we move forward, and part of the question is what role Clinton will claim in an Obama campaign and administration. I actually don't think the VP slot is likely; it disrupts his campaign theme and it's not really a role that showcases her strengths. I would think she'll be offered some significant role, perhaps overseeing health care reform. It's possible Obama could end up with several of the former Democratic Presidential contenders involved in his administration; some of the possibilities include Edwards at AG, Biden at State, perhaps Richardson as VP. (Oh, and Bill Clinton as UN Ambassador?) Regardless of what particular people he chooses, I think it's important that he surrounds himself with people who aren't afraid to challenge his positions, who have strong ideas of their own, but who can work well as a unified team once a consensus decision is reached.

In a way, this is what Democrats themselves ought to do going forward. Obama and Clinton supporters don't have to agree on every issue, and Obama isn't "right" because he got the nomination. There's plenty of room within the party for discussion about the best way to achieve the goals we share, as long as we can work together when the chips are down. One of the strengths of Obama's campaign has been its deliberate bottom-up organization; despite the sometimes obsessive focus on his soaring rhetoric, the movement really isn't about him. Anyone who's volunteered for his campaign can attest that there is a goal to build a large-scale grassroots presence throughout the US that will influence local politics as well as help elect Democrats to national office. These are goals that Clinton supporters can get behind, whatever their opinion of Obama or of some of his stances. And of course the best way to influence the party is from within; we'll work to elect Democrats who will work for us and then we'll hold them accountable for their promises and try to persuade them to see things our way on those issues where we disagree with the leadership.

In the end, Clinton lost because of a sluggish campaign that didn't take advantage of the delegate allocation rules, that was fractured by infighting, and that was ill-served by top advisers who misread the political winds. After two terms of Republican incompetence "change" was always going to be a difficult theme to run against, and if it was a predictable direction for the Obama campaign to go it still somehow caught the Clinton campaign flatfooted. However, the primary did expose some legitimate concerns about the process by which we choose a nominee, and now that the primary is concluded Obama and Clinton supporters need to sit down together and work to reform the system. A randomized order for primaries and clearcut consequences if states don't abide by the rules would be a good start. The positive aspects of the long and hotly contested primary include increased Democratic registration in many of the states that will be battlegrounds in November.

So, a classy conclusion to her historic campaign, and I am sure that she will continue to have significant influence shaping the direction of the Democratic party.

Update: notable excerpts from the speech; I hope you will forgive the lengthy quotes but there was a lot worth quoting:

Thank you so much. Thank you all.

Well, this isn’t exactly the party I’d planned, but I sure like the company.

I want to start today by saying how grateful I am to all of you – to everyone who poured your hearts and your hopes into this campaign, who drove for miles and lined the streets waving homemade signs, who scrimped and saved to raise money, who knocked on doors and made calls, who talked and sometimes argued with your friends and neighbors, who emailed and contributed online, who invested so much in our common enterprise, to the moms and dads who came to our events, who lifted their little girls and little boys on their shoulders and whispered in their ears, "See, you can be anything you want to be."

[...] I understand that we all know this has been a tough fight. The Democratic Party is a family, and it’s now time to restore the ties that bind us together and to come together around the ideals we share, the values we cherish, and the country we love.

We may have started on separate journeys – but today, our paths have merged. And we are all heading toward the same destination, united and more ready than ever to win in November and to turn our country around because so much is at stake.

[...] So today, I am standing with Senator Obama to say: Yes we can.

Together we will work. We’ll have to work hard to get universal health care. But on the day we live in an America where no child, no man, and no woman is without health insurance, we will live in a stronger America. That’s why we need to help elect Barack Obama our President.

We’ll have to work hard to get back to fiscal responsibility and a strong middle class. But on the day we live in an America whose middle class is thriving and growing again, where all Americans, no matter where they live or where their ancestors came from, can earn a decent living, we will live in a stronger America and that is why we must elect Barack Obama our President.

We’ll have to work hard to foster the innovation that makes us energy independent and lift the threat of global warming from our children’s future. But on the day we live in an America fueled by renewable energy, we will live in a stronger America. That’s why we have to help elect Barack Obama our President.

We’ll have to work hard to bring our troops home from Iraq, and get them the support they’ve earned by their service. But on the day we live in an America that’s as loyal to our troops as they have been to us, we will live in a stronger America and that is why we must help elect Barack Obama our President.

[...] As we gather here today in this historic magnificent building, the 50th woman to leave this Earth is orbiting overhead. If we can blast 50 women into space, we will someday launch a woman into the White House.

Although we weren’t able to shatter that highest, hardest glass ceiling this time, thanks to you, it’s got about 18 million cracks in it. And the light is shining through like never before, filling us all with the hope and the sure knowledge that the path will be a little easier next time.

[...] And looking out at you today, I have never felt so blessed. The challenges that I have faced in this campaign are nothing compared to those that millions of Americans face every day in their own lives. So today, I’m going to count my blessings and keep on going. I’m going to keep doing what I was doing long before the cameras ever showed up and what I’ll be doing long after they’re gone: Working to give every American the same opportunities I had, and working to ensure that every child has the chance to grow up and achieve his or her God-given potential.

I will do it with a heart filled with gratitude, with a deep and abiding love for our country– and with nothing but optimism and confidence for the days ahead. This is now our time to do all that we can to make sure that in this election we add another Democratic president to that very small list of the last 40 years and that we take back our country and once again move with progress and commitment to the future.

Thank you all and God bless you and God bless America.

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

DING-FREAKING-DONG

(#98120)

And about time, too. Doubtless I'll be accused of ungraciousness or pettiness by some here, but Sen. Clinton's conduct in this race has been indefensible, and for her to exit without so much as a token apology for her viciousness and dishonesty does nothing to rehabilitate her in my eyes.

Will her supporters vote for Obama? Honestly, I have no idea. I have a hard time getting into the headspace of someone who still supports her after the rhetoric of the last month. We'll just have to see.

The other day I heard that ignorance and apathy are sweeping the country. I didn't know that, but I don't really care.

It'd Be Pointless Anyway

(#98180)
M Scott Eiland's picture

If she doesn't actually say "I hereby swear that I will not run for President again until at least 2016," Obama had better be watching for that stiletto between his shoulderblades. A lot of Democrats have finally been willing to say out loud what they knew or should have known to be true about the Clintons all along, and if they think that HRC is suddenly going to pour heart and soul into getting Obama elected and thereby all but foreclosing any chance she has for being President, they're in for another sharp pain in the backside before November rolls around.

To strive, to seek, to find, and not to yield.--from Ulysses, by Alfred, Lord Tennyson

Oh please

(#98184)

just because some people got overwrought and started mouthing Republican lies and propaganda doesn't make it true. They also declared that Clinton would never concede, that she'd destroy the party at the convention, etc. etc. So in that way they're emulating the Republicans - they're wrong again.

I blame it all on the Internet

*glances upward. . .

(#98187)
M Scott Eiland's picture

. . .and notes the comment heading "DING FREAKING DONG"*

Sure, Hank--it's just a lot of Republican lies and propaganda. Pay it no mind.

To strive, to seek, to find, and not to yield.--from Ulysses, by Alfred, Lord Tennyson

Yup

(#98190)

that is all it is.

I blame it all on the Internet

Has Anyone Ever Seen Hank and Chelsea Clinton in the Same Room?

(#98355)

Just wondering.

“Two clichés make us laugh but a hundred clichés move us, because we sense dimly that the clichés are talking among themselves, celebrating a reunion." - Umberto Eco

Ouch

(#98370)
M Scott Eiland's picture

I'll have to thank you for this, Harley--I'll be able to spend my time here this summer writing sports articles (and reviewing the new 4E Dungeons and Dragons books that are even now arriving in my hot little hands), because there's clearly no point in my engaging in any Clinton bashing--it's being handled.

To strive, to seek, to find, and not to yield.--from Ulysses, by Alfred, Lord Tennyson

Or Harley and Andrew Sullivan? nt

(#98367)

I blame it all on the Internet

Republican?

(#98194)

The Republicans weren't likening the primary to an election in Zimbabwe, or suddenly deciding that the rules they had agreed to in advance didn't apply any more, or inventing Newspeak to obscure the true contours of the race and incite feelings of unfairness in their supporters, or engaging in open race-baiting. And not even McCain will have anything to do with Richard Mellon Scaife. Comparing McCain's primary-season conduct with Clinton's is a grievous insult to John McCain.

The other day I heard that ignorance and apathy are sweeping the country. I didn't know that, but I don't really care.

Apparently you missed the memo

(#98208)

any criticism of the Clintons is an unwise fit of emotionalism and only acts to spread Republican lies.

"We should not tie the hands of law enforcement in the effort to bring these terrorists to justice"- Leon E. Panetta

You're misrepresenting Hank.

(#98218)

Fits of emotionalism and the spread of Republican lies are not valid ways to criticize the Clintons (or anyone, for that matter).

Right

(#98226)
M Scott Eiland's picture

Because it was Republicans who were comparing Democratic elections to those in Zimbabwe--not the Clintons. Or floating RFK's assassination as why HRC should stay in the race. Or any number of other things that the Clintons and their surrogates (none of whom were Republicans, the last time I looked) were doing that were ticking off many, many, Democrats. Actually Republicans doing all of that. Got it.

So, when are SNK and Harley coming out as Republicans? I mean, they've been busily commenting on these things that the Clintons didn't *really* say, so they have to be Republican spies sent by Karl Rove, right?

To strive, to seek, to find, and not to yield.--from Ulysses, by Alfred, Lord Tennyson

Hardly

(#98219)

if your criticism of the Clintons doesn't pass his muster it is dismissed and you're backhandedly insulted. Just because he does not agree with the criticism does not mean it is either emotionalism or a Republican lie.

"We should not tie the hands of law enforcement in the effort to bring these terrorists to justice"- Leon E. Panetta

Ha

(#98223)

I blame it all on the Internet

I'll agree to that- nt

(#98224)

"We should not tie the hands of law enforcement in the effort to bring these terrorists to justice"- Leon E. Panetta

You wanted an apology over + above her shouting 'Yes we can!'??

(#98177)

That's .... ungracious + petty, snk!!!

This is why Dems lose so many elections

(#98117)

We're such downers. America is great. We're going to get it fixed. As Bill Clinton said, "We can do better, and we will"

"I don't know where bin Laden is. I have no idea and really don't care. It's not that important. It's not our priority."
- G.W. Bush, 3/13/02

Horaaaay!

(#98074)

Now let's never speak of this again.

Over here on E Street, we're proud to support Obama for President. - Bruce Springsteen

HA perfect nt

(#98077)

I blame it all on the Internet

The speech, however well meant, rang hollow

(#98066)

Did you hear the boos? It may well be Hillary can turn a few of her more vociferous supporters into the Democratic fold, but this struggle is Obama's to lose, and well he knows it.

After his speech yesterday, Obama rushed off to a room full of Hillary supporters to console and smooth ruffled feathers. By this account, he did a pretty good job. Obama knows he's got to first court the Hillary voters before he goes after McCain.

Rang Hollow?

(#98076)

You must have watched a different speech than me. It was a great, unifying speech with a great, unifying crowd.

"I don't know where bin Laden is. I have no idea and really don't care. It's not that important. It's not our priority."
- G.W. Bush, 3/13/02

great, except it was a downer that explains why Ds always lose?

(#98181)

To me it rang hollow. Tell you why...

(#98078)

Let's dispose of one misapprehension you may have: Hillary did mean what she said. I think she's on board.

But unless her followers are on board, viewing themselves as Democrats first and Hillary fans second, it doesn't matter what she says. A substantial portion of her voters will not vote for Obama under any circumstances. Some will vote for McCain.

Therefore, the speech does ring hollow. Hillary's supporters don't go to her rally in the way an Obama supporter would: she's not the rock star. She's endeared herself to lower middle class people, the swing vote which has given every president since Nixon a mandate. Obama did not get those voters. He may never get those voters.

All this we know, it shouldn't need saying. Hillary's supporters are not universally Democrats first. Obama can't budge from his existing positions, lest he alienate the more liberal part of his constituency. My personal barometer of the Obama Supporter is DailyKos: they do not like Hillary at present, and drove off her supporters. Now nyceve wants them all back, after the rude things said of those supporters. Fat feckin' chance, you asinine Kossacks. Shoulda made your words sweeter, now you get to eat them all.

I am one of those driven off Dailykos

(#98096)

by the absurdity of the Obama supporters on that site. Obama has some over-the-top supporters. Obama has always been top-rate. I supported Hillary in the primary and am extremely disappointed in what has happened at Dailykos. I'm voting for Obama without a second thought. Obama's positions are virtually identical to Hillary's and he's a better speaker.

Oh yeah, he's black. That will be difficult for some folks out there, but not the vast majority of Hillary supporters.

"I don't know where bin Laden is. I have no idea and really don't care. It's not that important. It's not our priority."
- G.W. Bush, 3/13/02

That's Incorrect

(#98085)

Obama doesn't need to budge from a single existing position to have nearly the identical positions to as Clinton. In that sense, it's not about positions, it's about emotions. And if Clinton continues to campaign for Obama like she did today, it will be more than enough. And enough is White Women, Older White Women in particular, among the most loyal and important Dem constituencies. We never needed the "aren't universally Democrats" anyway. Except for those Independents Obama already does very well with.

And if your personal barometer of the Obama supporter is DailyKos than you clearly don't know a great deal about Obama supporters.

“Two clichés make us laugh but a hundred clichés move us, because we sense dimly that the clichés are talking among themselves, celebrating a reunion." - Umberto Eco

Well, everyone comes from a slightly different place.

(#98107)

I sense things will go well with Obama, if he continues to reach out to the Clinton folks. It's not enough for Hillary to do it.

From where I sit, Obama differs from Hillary on many points. Her take on the Iraq War is one such difference, health care is another. These aren't trivial distinctions. We're no longer in a position to afford a soft cushion of social support services. We can't even afford to do a proper job with Katrina: it's still a mess down there. Education's failing. A growing rind of frostbitten flesh is forming on the body politic: the hard-core unemployed and unemployable. The prisons are full to bursting. Emergency rooms are closing down. We're just going to have to accept many of these things. We had a pretty good run from the fifties through to the middle nineties, but the signs were all there. Other more eager nations, populated by savers, not spenders are already eating our lunch.

Neither Obama nor Clinton will be able to keep their promises without raising taxes. Already other nations have a lower corporate taxation structure than we do: these corporations are leaving.

An architect friend of mine one remarked on the State of Illinois building in downtown Chicago: "it will make a magnificent ruin". I look at the Mercantile Exchange and say the same thing.

Friend of mine needs to lose A Lot of weight, forty kilos at least. He's got symptoms of incipient diabetes. So I told him, go to the doctor, get your body mass index calculated, get a plan worked out with him, start keeping a journal of what you eat... did he do it? No, I come back from the movies (Prince Caspian) to find an email from him, about how he's gonna lose weight with wu-yi tea. Yeah, buddy. Lay off the cold bottles of brew-yi, then let's talk.

Romans used to have an image of manliness Agricola the Farmer, rough, tough man of the soil. The more effete they became, the more they bragged about their manliness, right up until Alaric the Goth arrived at the gates of Rome and all the brave men with titles like Honorius had fled away.

Why should I hold out any hope for the politicians to change the fundamentals of American's decline? We want results, but we don't want to pay for them. When the politicians fail us, as they always do, then we'll blame them. Wu-yi tea and vitamin water and low-fat chocolate and health care for all, including the epidemic of diabetes caused by overeating. You can always pick the Americans out in the crowd: they're the fat ones. America needs to go on a goddamn diet and start saving: night is coming and we're up to our ears in obligations and debt, addicted to oil and cheap labor.

But America won't do any of these things, and Obama for all his flowery speeches can't make America over again. He'll try, but when his hopeful promises can't be fulfilled, when the creditor nations finally cut us loose, write us off and foreclose on us, we'll become another Spain. Spain had a good run while the gold and silver were flowing out of the New World, and America had a good run while the petroleum kept flowing to fuel our obese cars.

The real reforms can only be effected by Congress and the markets. We need to see ourselves as we are seen: fat spendthrifts who live far beyond our means. Maybe some day, when the whole rotten superstructure has collapsed, we can start again, humbler, wiser, building on a sounder foundation.

Wow

(#98109)

America is not in decline. Far from it. We have some issues we need to sort out but we are still strong, hardworking people. Also, we have a vibrant democracy - a strength which allows us to change course when necessary. Now it is necessary.

"I don't know where bin Laden is. I have no idea and really don't care. It's not that important. It's not our priority."
- G.W. Bush, 3/13/02

You shouldn't dismiss his concerns so easily

(#98114)

we have some real problems here (in addition to the ones Blaise pointed out), from an unhealthy reliance on cheap energy to an unhealthy reliance on finance instead of design and manufacturing. Most of all, we have an unhealthy reliance on politicians telling us we're the best at everything, and the electorate believing it.

I blame it all on the Internet

The Boos

(#98069)

You had to really look for them to find them. And Hank's right, there will always be some dead enders, but their number will begin a precipitous decline, starting today.

“Two clichés make us laugh but a hundred clichés move us, because we sense dimly that the clichés are talking among themselves, celebrating a reunion." - Umberto Eco

Oh, there are always some dead-enders

(#98068)

who will never support anyone but their candidate. I think that number will be relatively small and shrinking as the campaign moves on, though. The best thing Obama could do would be to synergize his approach with Clintons. As has been noted, she strongly appeals to older women and working class voters - if Obama adds that to his call for change, and coordinates with Clinton on some high profile proposed appointments to his administration and some populist economic messages, they can tag team McCain into either following suit or (stupidly) taking them on directly.

I know a lot of people find Clinton's style abrasive and annoying, but it will be a powerful addition to Obamas among the kinds of people who are not represented here at theforvm. By definition, we are not representative of the electorate at large.

I blame it all on the Internet

To be sure, the number of dead-enders will shrink

(#98073)

but by how much, none can say. Seems to me Obama must reach out to the Clinton camp through Clinton herself. She carries within herself the hopes and dreams of many women who endured the struggle for women's equality, and Obama can never fulfill those dreams.

Obama and Clinton seem to be icons of two separate struggles from long ago: segregation and sexism, but neither were truly part of those struggles. Hillary Clinton begins her political life as a Goldwater Republican. Obama's sui generis transformation from biracial citizen of the world to an emblem of the American black experience is no less strategic, no less artificial. We must resist the urge to turn these people into that most condescending of compliments "a credit to his race" or its ugly variant "a credit to her sex"

There's one aspect of the Clinton-Obama dialectic we don't hear much about in any cogent argument: the generational gap. My own biracial children are baffled by the old racial divisions. To them, the black identity is as much a personal preference as the collection of music in an iPod. They don't buy into the Hispano or Black rhetoric, that's for old people. Girls sport Playboy rabbit icons on their dressers, and will openly talk about a boy's ass, laugh and tell even dear old Dad "I like much back and I will not lie."

Hillary represents one generation, Obama another. Both are needed for victory. But let's not icon-ify either of these politicians: at the end of the day, they're grasping, power-hungry realists, not the idealists they proclaim themselves to be. Vote for them, but let's not trust them to fulfill all our hopes and dreams.

Well of course

(#98079)

your problem appears to be with politics (and politicians) in general and the current American variant in particular. I'm not iconifying anyone, I'm just talking about the practical issues surrounding blocs of support and how to assemble them to win in November. I don't think it's a Second Coming nor do I think that all problems on this Earth will be solved, but it's got to be better than the current administration. I'm pretty sure we can agree on that.

The generation gap thing is overblown, I can find people older and younger than I am that I agree with much more than people of my own age. As far as I can tell, you can look for unity or you can look for divisions, and find plenty of each for any characteristic you choose. I'll be looking for unity, at least for the next five months.

I blame it all on the Internet

Out of curiosity, do you know any die-hard Hillary supporters?

(#98080)

I do. They're not happy. Haven't talked to any of them in the last few days, but they disapprove of Obama on principle. They don't think he's a realist. One has taken to calling him Chocolate Jesus. Not a harbinger of good things to come.

The Obama-Clinton split points out the deep divisions between the Democratic Party. The only thing which unites them is their dislike of McCain and the Republicans.

Nominal Conservatives are similarly divided along Libertarian and what I would call Burke-ian / WFBuckley Conservatism.

Why, given the ugly rhetoric from both sides of the Democratic split, would the Democrats unite around Obama, as far-left as any politician in this era? O do not say Change, for these changes horrify some constituencies. He will no more Unite than did another Uniter Not Divider, our current bedraggled president. Obama has united many disparate elements within the Democratic Party, and I do intend to vote for him, but I'm not entirely happy with him as our candidate.

Nor am I a complete cynic about politicians. Politicians are attracted to power for many reasons, many quite admirable. Power can be used effectively, in the right hands, must be used. Power can be squandered or simply go unused. We must not condemn politicians, but if Congress' poll numbers are indicative of the Zeitgeist, Americans are deeply resentful of that body. They like their own Congress-critter, but as a species, once elected, they serve their own interests and not ours.

Yes I do

(#98082)

in fact I live with one. She's not happy about how things turned out, but she also has no problem supporting and voting for Obama. There's a difference between enthusiasm and support.

Of course there are divisions, but I don't think they're as deep or unbridgeable as you do. I certainly don't think they're anywhere near as bad as the Republican ones, and I don't think Democrats will need to backpedal and make excuses like Republicans will be doing for the next five months.

I just don't agree that Obama is that far left, in any sane classification he's a moderate. I'm not entirely happy with any politician, but you work with reality, not dreams. On the other hand, here's one dream/prediction from me: if the Democrats manage to get large majorities in Congress and start passing their agenda, the approval rating for Congress will increase (but remember that Congress always polls at least 10 points behind the resident).

I blame it all on the Internet

What's with the timing?

(#98064)

I missed the speech. Because it was given in the middle of a Saturday in summer. Probably the time of week when the majority of the US would be busy doing other things.

Why do you suppose they wanted to do it then? Some calculated move, or it was just best for her schedule? Probably nothing, but these days every tiny move seems to mean something.

Probably Wanted To Make Sure It Was Covered. . .

(#98084)
M Scott Eiland's picture

. . .before Big Brown wins the Belmont this afternoon (the second favorite scratched this morning--so it's almost a sure thing now) and everyone gets caught up in 70's nostalgia for a few days.

To strive, to seek, to find, and not to yield.--from Ulysses, by Alfred, Lord Tennyson

Wow, you aren't kidding, he's going off at 1-4 odds

(#98090)

Still, anything can happen... we'll know soon.

Come, my friends. 'Tis not too late to seek a newer world -- Tennyson

woah

(#98093)

he pulled up... hope nothing happened.

Come, my friends. 'Tis not too late to seek a newer world -- Tennyson

Just Playing It Safe. . .

(#98099)
M Scott Eiland's picture

. . .once it was obvious he couldn't finish in the money. Oh well, off to twenty years of lots and lots of sex for the big guy.

Da'Tara certainly blew away what was left of the field--that'll make his owners some money they probably weren't expecting.

To strive, to seek, to find, and not to yield.--from Ulysses, by Alfred, Lord Tennyson

A few great lines in the speech:

(#98058)

And although we weren't able to shatter that highest, hardest glass ceiling this time, thanks to you it's got about 18 million cracks in it.

Well said, and well delivered, a historic remark. Overall it was an uneven speech, and a few times her awful delivery combined with an awful line to leave you just shaking your head:

For as long as America has existed, it has been the American way to reject can't do claims and to choose instead to extend the boundless and possible.

Rejecting can't-do claims? This stuff sounds like it was cribbed from an insurance policy, about as uninspiring and wooden a rah-rah line as I've ever heard. Same with the flat-footed repetition of the "elect Senator Obama" line.

She was strongest when talking about the historic role of women, weakest when it came to delivering boilerplate campaign speak about moving forward not backward, progress, optimism, etc.

It was enjoyable, a historic but imperfect speech, and I have to say I got no real sense of what she's planning to do now. She's "endorsing" Obama but "suspending" not "ending" her campaign. What does that mean? I can't wait to find out.

As Noted Yesterday

(#98060)

Suspending the campaign, as Edwards did before her, allows Hillary to raise money within Fed guidelines.

“Two clichés make us laugh but a hundred clichés move us, because we sense dimly that the clichés are talking among themselves, celebrating a reunion." - Umberto Eco

Guess I just failed wonk school. :)

(#98063)

Thanks Harley & Brendan. I didn't know about the Fed guidelines. I'll dial my paranoifier back to 9.

Heh

(#98065)

As I had to dial back my own.

“Two clichés make us laugh but a hundred clichés move us, because we sense dimly that the clichés are talking among themselves, celebrating a reunion." - Umberto Eco

Everyone initially suspends his or her campaign, though,

(#98059)

and I think usually it's just about the money.

Since she has so many delegates she keeps political clout that other contenders usually don't have, but I imagine she and Obama already worked out her role in their discussion so I don't think it's about that.

You're right about the speech, but the best parts were very effective and genuine.

Come, my friends. 'Tis not too late to seek a newer world -- Tennyson