New Cabinet members


I'm soliciting comments on Clinton at State + Richardson at Commerce.

However I assume most of us are fairly familiar w. those two and I'm most curious to have someone tell me what to think about the new overlord of the US banking, insurance, and probably auto industry -- Treas. Sec. Timothy F. Geithner. He's currently pres. of the Federal Reserve Bank of New York and worked in the Treas. dept. under Rubin + Summers. Other than that, I don't have much to go on about the guy other than this pic:

Since I haven't come across much informed commentary today, I'm going to try to form an initial opinion on the basis of the above photo.

First, that bit of a cowlick on the back right is a kind of scholarly sign and potentially speaks to his intelligence. Plus the transparently fake smile might mean he's a bit removed from social interactions and capable of occupying an objective viewpt. unencumbered by group-think. OTOH, there's a bit of a nasty turn to that smile -- almost a grimace really -- and his eyebrows are downturned in an unfriendly fashion. Perhaps he will merely sick to enrich his banker friends at the expense of the average taxpayer.

i.e. I'm finding it a little difficult to form an opinion of the guy. Apparently the DOW liked him since it rose today, but that means pretty much nothing. I'd to know what Geithner thinks of the structure of the current bailout and whether he's shown any prescience re the financial crisis generally.

This is an info. gathering thread, an invitiation to comment on our new Treas. Sec.'s appearance/other new cabinet apptees.

Update: I received a salon article claiming Geithner was indeed prescient re the recent crisis:

Before the storm fully broke, Geithner made heroic efforts to get Wall Street's biggest financial institutions to voluntarily come together to rein in the wild west world of credit swaps

http://www.salon.com/tech/htww/2008/11/21/geithner_for_treasury_secretary/

However It's also true from photos that are coming to light that the man seems to have no eyebrows to speak of:

--

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
Well, I didn't want Summers. (#137787)
by M Aurelius

In fact I signed a petition against him.

So at least that bullet was dodged.

I don't know much about Geithner. At least he's relatively new. Summers was more of the same. He was also one of the guys who pushed deregulation in 1999.

--

Of course not!

You realize he worked for them.... (#137851)
by Bernard Guerrero

...at Treasury, right? The guy you called "more of the same" and the guy who was on the board of Citigroup during the recent debacles? :^)

--

The ultimate result of shielding man from the effects of folly is to people the world with fools. -Herbert Spencer

Oh, of course. (#137863)
by M Aurelius

I know a lot of trivia about the guy. I know Jim Cramer hates him, for example, which is likely to actually be a good sign.

But you know, I've had bosses, and I've never been a copy of any of them. Sometimes, you learn as much what you shouldn't do from the people you work for as what you should.

Truth is, I expect the job to be too big for him. But to tell the truth I can't think of anybody who you couldn't say the same thing for.

What this tells me is that Obama is going to try to fix the mess working within the bounds of the establishment. If he pulls it off, great. If not, he might be forced to throw the establishment out the window.

It sort of looks like one scenario is that we have a crash "landing" rather than a total crash, while the Chinese get their economy in gear. They have the money to do it. If they pull it off, it's the end of an era, ours, but we avoid a global depression.

--

Of course not!

Ah, I think Cramer's hate is mostly show. (#137865)
by Bernard Guerrero

His show, that is. He's in the entertainment biz, after all. I understand he blames Geithner for Lehman being tossed to the wolves. Truth be told, I think that's turned out to be the worst thing done during the entire crisis, though I'm not sure how much of it was Geithner. It was also understandable, given the worries about moral hazard and the bitching that was going on at the time. Out of the frying pan...

Anyway, the Chinese are screwed, and in a far deeper way than we or the Europeans. They have to pull off a readjustment an order of magnitude larger than our own, and we're probably going to undercut their Treasury holdings by printing ourselves out of this mess. That doesn't mean their long-term prospects are bad, but I think they're in for a horrendous 2009.

--

The ultimate result of shielding man from the effects of folly is to people the world with fools. -Herbert Spencer

You've got to figure that was ultimately Paulson's call (#137908)
by catchy

tho who knows what Geithner's role was. Glad to see you agreeing w. Krugman, tho.

He's also been criticized for his handling of JP Morgan buyout of Stearns. I think he pretty much handled that one and I've read a few folks say that Morgan got away with murder for only paying $2 a share.

Wasn't that deal restructured? -nt- (#137916)
by Punditus Maximus

.

--

It's impossible to debate if people simply hold beliefs that have no grounding in reality.

Well, they actually make stuff. (#137867)
by M Aurelius

They have to pull off a readjustment an order of magnitude larger than our own

We'll see. I'm not seeing what you are, whatever that is. Can you elaborate?

--

Of course not!

The Chinese may make stuff.... (#137932)
by Jay C

But who buys most of it?

Relatively (#137788)
by catchy

he worked for Summers + Rubin.

Summers has been app.ted some unspecified senior advisory role. There's speculation he might take over Bernanke's position.

Any reason besides pushing deregulation that you signed a petition contra Sumemrs?

Summers is really smart, (#137810)
by Punditus Maximus

but he seems to keep coming down on the wrong side of important decisions. He's also said some extremely stupid sexist things.

--

It's impossible to debate if people simply hold beliefs that have no grounding in reality.

The market likes Geithner. (#137757)
by BlaiseP

It shot up like a rocket on the news. Maybe that's because they sense Geithner will actually do something.

Let's Hear The Man Talk (#137742)
by M Scott Eiland

Since he's not another Clinton retread, we might actually be pleasantly surprised. I certainly wouldn't mind some good news there.

--

Meaning let's hear him talk *before* confirmation, right? (#137854)
by tomsyl

Even though all of Obama's picks obviously will be rubber-stamped by the Senate, it would be useful to gt this guy's thoughts and theories on the record before those truncated hearings begin imo. Part of that is making a record of what the Obama Administration thinks will help fix the economic crisis, but I also want to know how an insider will convince the people that he won't act the way Paulson has done once he gets hold of the notional (like that word, specially here) $350 billion or so left of the bailout treasure chest.

--

Even a dead midget is far from light. - Confucius

That huge birthmark (#137726)
by aireachail

on his left hand...it surely hints at some sorta extra-sensory powers, don't ya think?

--

Excess on occasion is exhilarating. It prevents moderation from acquiring the deadening effect of a habit. - W. Somerset Maugham

The Mark of The Beast? (#137855)
by tomsyl

--

--

Even a dead midget is far from light. - Confucius

He's gonna need any extra-sensory powers (#137741)
by catchy

Remember when the Treas. Sec.'s biggest challenges were keeping his mouth shut about a strong $ policy?

Despite the fact (#137753)
by aireachail

that nearly every disaster movie I've ever seen has some would-be hero lunge forward and try to save everyone just before the inevitable impact with terra firma, there is something encouraging in the fact that someone would even take the job at this point.

I'm heartened that he may think he can level this crate out!

--

Excess on occasion is exhilarating. It prevents moderation from acquiring the deadening effect of a habit. - W. Somerset Maugham

If someone offered you $350 billion to spend however (#137857)
by tomsyl

you liked, what would you do? Remember that I am your bestest friend, I hope. I've got this start-up autorickshaw project that needs $100 mil ASAP before the monsoon season in Bangkok . . .

--

Even a dead midget is far from light. - Confucius

abortions for everyone!! (#137874)
by Username

and government-subsidized gay marriage licenses!

Energy, environment, transportation, biotech, space. (#137869)
by M Aurelius

More or less in that order.

And $350B wouldn't be enough, unless I could spend it every two years, give or take.

--

Of course not!

You really really really... (#137866)
by Punditus Maximus

...don't want to know the answer to that question.

--

It's impossible to debate if people simply hold beliefs that have no grounding in reality.

Links

Conservative
Liberal
Moderate/Mixed/Non-Partisan
Non-Political/Reference

Related Sites -

Polisci Applied (Aaron)
Intrepid Liberal Journal (Intrepid Liberal)
Obsidian Wings (Bird Dog)
Open Hand/Open Eye (locutas)
Red State (Bird Dog)
Swords Crossed (brendanm98)
Wagster Speaks (Wagster)
WatchingAmerica (BlaiseP)
The Social Pathologist (TSP)

Foreign Affairs -

Abu Aardvark
'Aqoul
American Footprints
Council on Foreign Relations
CSIS
Democracy Arsenal
Intel Dump
The Fourth Rail
War and Piece

Politics -

Ace of Spades HQ
Andrew Sullivan
Balloon Juice
Belgravia Dispatch
Captain's Quarters
Crooked Timber
Curmudgeonly & Skeptical
Daily Kos
Democracy Arsenal
Eschaton
Firedoglake
Glenn Greenwald
Global Guerrillas
Hugh Hewitt
Instapundit
Jawa Report
Lawyers, Guns and Money
Liberals Against Terror
Matt Yglesias
Michael J. Totten
Michelle Malkin
Moon of Alabama
New America
OxBlog
Patterico
Political Animal
Political Wire
Publius Pundit
QandO
Reality Based Community
Talking Points Memo
The Agitator
The Belmont Club
The Corner
Truman Project
Winds of Change.net

War -

Counterterrorism Blog
Iraq the Model
Jihad Watch
Small Wars Journal Blog

Economics and Business -

Angry Bear
Brad DeLong
Daniel Drezner
Mahalanobis
Marginal Revolution
Roubini Global Economics
The Big Picture

Science and Tech -

Bad Astronomy
New Scientist
Real Climate
Science Blogs
Scientific American
The Panda's Thumb

Legal -

Balkinization
Conglomerate
Ideoblog
Jurisdynamics
Law and Letters
Overlawyered
ProfessorBainbridge
ScotusBlog
Talk Left
The Becker-Posner Blog
Volokh Conspiracy

Sports -

Baseball Crank
Baseball Musings
Baseball Reference.com
ESPN.com
NFL.com
Only Baseball Matters
The Sports Economist

Books, Film and Music -

Amazon.com
Internet Movie Database
All Music Guide

News and Aggregators -

Asia Times
Boingboing
CNN
Digg
English Russia
Fark
Los Angeles Times
Memeorandum
MSNBC
Politico
Poynteronline
Slashdot
The New York Times
The Washington Post

References -

Wikipedia
Your Dictionary