The Man Has a Brilliant Publicist


is what my wife wrote when she sent along this link: http://www.suntimes.com/news/nation/1077958,novak072808.article

My first thought was 'lawyer's advice.' However, since this story is most likely true, I must reverse my previous stand on his punishment for attempted vehicular manslaughter and leaving the scene of an accident--which this diagnosis might very well explain--and join the rest of the world in wishing Bob Novak a full and speedy recovery. I've lost two dear friends to brain tumors, and it's not something I'd wish on anyone.

While we're on the subject of 'Brilliant Publicists' let us regard the ongoing and altogether remarkable case of the free press that didn't bark in the night, vis-a-vis the John Edwards affair. I never expected to see in my lifetime the spectacle of our nation's entire media services--print, TV, radio news--all conspiring to ignore a news story with a self-censorship that has now exceeded any of Orwell's wildest dreams. One can't say there's a double standard at work here--certainly the NYT would have happily crucified Huckabee or Romney (Giuliani has done it so often it's not actually news) for this--I'm sure that if it had been a Clinton-related or even a Bidenesque indiscretion, it would have at least found its way into the back pages somewhere. Silence about Obama I can understand--in fact I now expect--but John Edwards? Why the reverent hush? Is it because of his sainted wife, Elizabeth? Even Fox News tiptoed around with it when they dared to bring it up at all. Not so the British press; Sarah Jenkins in the 'Times' (I believe, or it could have been the 'Daily Mail') nailed Edwards to a tree with her unflinching portrait of a man who had an affair with another woman while his wife was dying which resulted in the birth of a child, then cynically manipulated a consenting press into believing it was that of of a married man on his staff. Why that same press continues to cover for him points to a deep sickness in our nation's public discourse.

Why does this matter? Why is it the business of the public? Because this was a man who believed himself fit to be president. And who as recently as last week was in the running for the vice-presidency. If he could deceive his dying wife this cynically, just imagine how he might have treated the rest of us, once in office. One can convincingly make a case that other political deceptions might matter far more--yet this is not the humblest of acorns. Edwards seems hell-bent on rehabilitating the moral reputation of Bill Clinton.
--

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
ahem, back to the topic at hand (#105816)
by heet

I read this today and thought : "either that is an incredible coincidence or he's been sitting on a diagnosis of brain cancer for a while". The latter depends on which type of cancer he has... The most common doesn't let you live long enough to sit on the information.

--

Over here on E Street, we're proud to support Obama for President. - Bruce Springsteen

There's another possibility, (#105817)
by Brooks and B Ra...

There's another possibility, quite plausible in the case of sweet Mr. Novak: He just got the diagnosis last week, and thought "Well, there's a silver lining here. Now I can can finally get away with driving into a f*&#ing pedestrian!"

I didn't even think of that (#105833)
by heet

I am either lacking in imagination or overly endowed with morality. Both possibilities are depressing.

--

Over here on E Street, we're proud to support Obama for President. - Bruce Springsteen

You call yours "morality". (#105845)
by Brooks and B Ra...

You call yours "morality". That's an odd name for one's member.

I thought that as well (#105825)
by Pranky

just didn't bring it up.

yawn. Sorry, bigger fish to (#105756)
by Brooks and B Ra...

yawn. Sorry, bigger fish to fry than where a politician (may have) put his pecker. (ouch, I'll try to remember not to put "pecker" and "fry" in the same sentence again.)

Hey, how's this for a tongue-twister:
Politicians put their peckers in plenty of pu**ies.

Or this one:
Who cares whose hoo-ha he hounds?

It's Cryin' Time (#105751)
by BlaiseP

It's a pity nobody gives two flying fagioli for another such go-round of Gotcha Politics.

Ah, the years roll by, and we look back in wistful fondness over the career of that elderly reptile Robert Novak. Fade through the hands of the clock winding back, cross-fade to the calendar pages turning, resolve to the Year of Our Lord Two Thousand ‘n Four.

Cut to a younger Bob Novak, pecking away on his ancient Remington Standard 2 typewriter. Cue soundtrack, closeup of typewriter, letters emerge. Whack, whackwhack, whack. Etcetera, etc. Ding. Krump, Novak hits the return lever, scritchscritch, a sheet of paper emerges from his typewriter. Long shot, Novak gazes at the page, grins toothily, in obvious sadistic satisfaction.

Yes, when we consider the appalling list of Bush spokesmen, we hark back to another list, that of the later Roman Emperors, another procession of lying scum, each of which would own up to lies told by immediate predecessors, only to tell a few more himself. Tony Snow’s first words from behind his pulpit were lies, and that sweaty catamite Scotty McClellan was a veritable bullshit fire hose, but Novak stands alone, uniquely villainous, a bona-fide traitor. It is one thing to reveal the President is getting his weenie waxed on the clock, but Clinton was fielding calls from Senators and Important Personages at the same time. It would seem to me Clinton deserves a medal, not an impeachment, but if a sign was posted at the front door of the White House reading “Presidential Blowjob Line Forms Here”, I am sure Robert Novak would be first in line to fellate the wrinkled member of our current Commander in Chief, and Cheney too.

For it was Robert Novak who first revealed the identity of Valerie Plame Wilson, a patent act of revenge at the behest of certain Unnamed Others. Naturally, when confronted, Novak would tell All About Armitage to that Dudley Do-Right prosecutor, though this blabbing would later blindside his good buddy Scooter Libby. But this is all past history, as the more fervent Protestants would say “my sins are washed away in the blood”. It is no accident so many of the current rogues whose asses now deposit farts in the Seats of Power in the White House are Evangelicals: no sin is too vile, no betrayal too treacherous such that it cannot be forgiven and washed away. Celestial Pardons are offered to all who suffer for the Cause. A New Life in Politics lies over Jordan.

Not content to rest on his laurels, Novak continues to assert it would be morally wrong to reveal the Judas within the White House who first gave Armitage the go-ahead to leak Valerie Plame’s name.

But some good came of all this: Judith Miller would end up in jail, and should probably still be there, were there any justice in this wicked world. She’s another Bush Fellatrix, starring in her own porn flick, rah-rahing the War on Iraq. Miller should be tried on separate charges for her hysterical rants about Weapons of Mass Distraction, but I wax prolix. Nombreux des méchants, peu de temps. Ask Joe Wilson for the translation, he speaks French.

But ol’ Bob Novak is not always so quick to abandon his friends when the chips are down. He still thinks the Swift Boat Veterans’ claims were “well-documented” and entirely truthful.

Alas, I feel a maudlin weepin’ sensation creeping over my aging carcass. It’s Cryin’ Time, yet another malicious old columnist may be shuffling off this Mortal Coil, though Bob Novak was always coiled up like a puff adder behind that old Remington of his. For my money, he cannot die soon enough. I am sure to incur the Wrath of the Righteous for carryin’ on this way, but pity was always a contemptible emotion. Robert Novak was beneath contempt. He was a rhetorical drive-by shooter. He descended through Dante’s Inferno, through the Sowers of Discord, the Falsifiers and is now among the Traitors.

Yikes, Blaise (#105763)
by Kierkegaard

I'm sure the Kopechnes had a few thoughts like that, too, when Ted Kennedy was diagnosed; however, at least they didn't go public with them. I never could stand Novak either--a few days ago I was urging jail time for him--but I've seen just how horribly brain tumors kill, robbing their victims even of the ability to frame sentences or understand what music is, before killing them, in conjunction with the treatments, of exhaustion and secondary infections. That's why I say I don't wish them on anybody.

As for who gives a whatever about Edwards affair--enough people do to sell out issues at the tabloid stand. But that's not the point. The point is it's news, even if nobody at all cares, just as it would be news if Hillary Clinton were caught shoplifting or Mike Huckabee took a meat-axe to his mother-in-law. It's news and no American news organs chose to report it. They are not in the business of deciding in advance whether or not anybody cares about it. "It's news, Vincenzo, NEWS..."

Sometimes... (#105974)
by M Aurelius

Mike Huckabee took a meat-axe to his mother-in-law.

...I wish you were somewhat less talented at drawing up vivid, haunting depictions like that.

Haunting, I tell you!

--

Of course not!

Perhaps, as the tumor spreads its tentacles through his brain (#105766)
by BlaiseP

Bob Novak's long-atrophied conscience will be reinvigorated. As he babbles and gasps and vomits, (yes, I've seen what an astrocytoma does to its victim), he will contemplate his treachery, and in the ultimate irony, will understand what he did and be unable to compose a fitting excuse for his crimes.

Yikerdoodles (#105770)
by Macallan

I had no idea that believing in lefty conspiracy tales would lead to wishing such illiberal things. Never let the facts get in the way of the hate.

Learn something everyday.

--

“I serve as a blank screen on which people of vastly different political stripes project their own views.”

Bob Novak is a traitor and a betrayer. (#105774)
by BlaiseP

All honest Americans should wish such men dead.

Of Valerie Plame, much has been said. She operated a front company for the CIA, probing the proliferation of weapons of mass destruction. She is clearly alive, and doing fine, or so it would seem. Her career at CIA is ruined, naturally, and I am less concerned for her than I might be.

But this I know for a fact, Macallan: a front company isn't run by one person. It employs many people, and everyone who ever carried the business card for Brewster Jennings Associates and anyone who ever dealt with them was also exposed.

Of these you have nothing to say, naturally enough. There are nameless stars engraved on the wall at CIA Langley, agents who died in the service of this country. The fates of the Brewster Jennings boys and girls caught in the avalanche of fallout surrounding Novak's leak does not concern you overmuch. It is more important that the phrase Conspiracy Tales be attached as a disclaimer to any mention of this sordid bit of treachery. Robert Novak is as guilty as Philip Agee or Robert Hanssen, but unlike those two traitors, he operated on behalf of traitors higher up in the White House. If that is not a high crime or misdemeanor, nothing is. Deny that.

Hm. I'm an honest American (#105783)
by Jordan

and yet I don't find myself wishing gruesome, dehumanizing death on people whose policies and methods I disagree with. I'd settle for humiliation...far more lethal in politics than merely dying, in any case.

--

Before you criticize someone, you should walk a mile in their shoes. That way when you criticize them, you're a mile away and you have their shoes. -JH

Indeed... (#105975)
by M Aurelius

The expression of bloodlust is so much more dangerous than people realize, regardless of the ideological bent that sources it. There is always some sorry bastard out there willing to take it literally, like this guy.

--

Of course not!

absolutely, MA (#106008)
by catchy

that was my reaction to reading these comments and on the same day I read about the anti-liberal shootings.

Treason is still on the books, Jordan. (#105796)
by BlaiseP

We haven't seen a case of treason in the USA in a while, unless you count the Adam Gadahn case, where he was convicted of treason.

Mostly we prosecute such things under espionage statutes, but this Valerie Plame thing was more akin to Benedict Arnold or Philip Agee. In the Plamegate incident, various persons from within the government exposed another government agent, not to one enemy government, but to all of them at once, through the press. We must return to Philip Agee to see anything of the sort, and the Intelligence Identities Protection Act was passed specifically to prosecute this sort of thing.

Somehow IIPA didn't work here. Hard to say why it didn't, because Novak was clearly guilty as hell. Let's stipulate to Novak's protection under First Amendment, even then, Armitage should have been prosecuted. He wasn't. Libby was convicted of lying about it. David Gregory also had the leak, but he didn't run with it, it was too hot for him.

What happened here? Am I wrong to hate a traitor of this sort? Do you seriously want me to wish the guy well, after all this? I wish he was dead. I really do. It's not about Valerie Plame, International Mystery Girl or her blabbermouth husband. It's about the people we'll never hear about, the people buried in the fallout from all this mess. Someone has to track the proliferation of nuclear weapons technology, and Valerie Plame was peeking in on those Pakistanis, remember that AQ Khan guy and all the damage he did? Someone in the White House decided they'd get back at Joe Wilson, and they didn't care about the fallout. They called up half the reporters in Washington, we know that now, and we still don't know who was doing all that calling. But I wish to hell someone would shoot that caller through the head.

Not much mystery if you read the IIPA. (#105810)
by Jordan

SEC. 601. (50 U.S.C. 421) (c) Whoever, in the course of a pattern of activities intended to identify and expose covert agents and with reason to believe that such activities would impair or impede the foreign intelligence activities of the United States, discloses any information that identifies an individual as a covert agent to any individual not authorized to receive classified information, knowing that the information disclosed so identifies such individual and that the United States is taking affirmative measures to conceal such individual’s classified intelligence relationship to the United States, shall be fined under title 18, United States Code, or imprisoned not more than three years, or both.

Seems it might apply to Novak, although as written the law looks like a prosecutorial nightmare with the three mens rea clauses. Novak would have several defense options as well, including:

SEC. 602. (50 U.S.C. 422) (a) It is a defense to a prosecution under section 601 that before the commission of the offense with which the defendant is charged, the United States had publicly acknowledged or revealed the intelligence relationship to the United States of the individual the disclosure of whose intelligence relationship to the United States is the basis for the prosecution.

This defense would apply, for example, if Novak were the second reporter brought in on the leak.

Assuming you could nail all of that on Novak, the best you could do under that law would be three years in jail, $10,000 fine. No firing squad, no electric chair. And of course what he did, while disgusting and destructive, comes nowhere near treason as defined in 18 USC.

So again, I'd settle for simple accountability and humiliation rather than gloat-killing the guy.

--

Before you criticize someone, you should walk a mile in their shoes. That way when you criticize them, you're a mile away and you have their shoes. -JH

Treason Prosecutions. . . (#105895)
by M Scott Eiland

. . .are a sucker's game in this day and age, anyway. The Constitution requires either two witnesses to an overt act of treason, or a confession by the defendant in open court (no signed confessions obtained out of court need apply!) to support a treason conviction--an almost impossible burden to meet unless the guy *wants* to be convicted or if his co-conspirators have a death wish. Far easier to get a conviction under more modern espionage laws, which can and did carry the death penalty before the Supreme Court started tightening down capital punishment standards in the 1970's.

--

Exactly (#105797)
by Pranky

We routinely hear at the Forvm how various enemies should end up mysteriously dead in an accident, assassinated by special ops or other Boyscout Tom Clancy fantasies.

Novak deserves the same.

I think Blaise was talking about Novak's deeds, not his politics (#105784)
by Username

So... (#105781)
by Macallan

...only dishonest Americans should wish him well?

Btw, you've got to stop this kind of stuff:

"Of these you have nothing to say, naturally enough."

"does not concern you overmuch."

I find it to unintentionally brilliant parody, but it's a bad habit.

--

“I serve as a blank screen on which people of vastly different political stripes project their own views.”

I certainly don't wish Novak what fate has in store for him: (#105795)
by JKC

but BlaiseP has a point, and I think it's fair to say that if Helen Thomas had outed a CIA agent at the bidding of Dennis Kucinich, you'd be amongst the first to be warming up the rhetorical tar and plucking chickens for feathers.

BlaiseP doesn't need me to defend him, but he's right: Novak committed a treasonous act.

Pardon? (#105798)
by Macallan

You're asserting that I'd wish a horrible painful death on a Helen Thomas if I only suspected her of treason, and that I'd be the amongst the first to do so?

--

“I serve as a blank screen on which people of vastly different political stripes project their own views.”

Not at all. (#105802)
by JKC

But you would call for her tail to be in stir, and for a good long time, too.

Or (#105808)
by Macallan

I wouldn't even mention it. The alleged concern about CIA identities always struck me as being situational and political rather than any kind of genuine conviction.

This most recent case will likely be rationalized as a "good" outing by too many.

--

“I serve as a blank screen on which people of vastly different political stripes project their own views.”

Two thoughts: (#105818)
by JKC

First, the Times was wrong. A few extenuating circumstances come to mind, but let's be fair. If it was wrong for Novak, it was wrong for the Times.

Second, though, the Times jeopardized one man. Blowing Plame's cover endangered the cover of everyone working for Brewster Jennings Associates. All the spinning Byron York can muster won't change that fact.

I don't follow (#105832)
by Macallan

"let's be fair"

How am I not being fair? I'm not one who has been situational on the subject, so I don't see how I'm not being "fair".

Since there is no spinning regarding Brewster Jennings, and the attempt to assert one outing is considerably worse than other strikes me as… well, spinning... I don't follow that thought either.

--

“I serve as a blank screen on which people of vastly different political stripes project their own views.”

"Let's be fair" (#105834)
by JKC

was aimed at me, Mac.

And I'd like to know at what point I've been "situational" about this.

I took pains (#105836)
by Macallan

...to say, "I'm not one who has been situational" rather than "I'm not the one who has been situational" so that it wasn't aimed at you. Oh well. Best layed plans and all that.

--

“I serve as a blank screen on which people of vastly different political stripes project their own views.”

my bad... (#105837)
by JKC

for adding a definite article where it didn't really exist.

Conspiracy Theories are like that, Mac. (#105785)
by BlaiseP

You need to cut out that sort of stuff if you don't want to be Wrongly Vilified. There was a genuine conspiracy here, to out a CIA agent. It worked. Nobody went to jail but Judith Miller, and Libby's sentence was commuted.

You don't have anything to say, when it comes to answering the basic allegation here: you still don't. Bob Novak was a traitor. I'm really down on traitors. You should be, too. There is no Unintentional Parody, except for the long hash of lies and Newspeak uttered by the White House.

Snark will not save you, Mac. Can I write a big WOW here, and get away with it? Nah, I'll stick to calling Novak a traitor and let someone braver than you get on his hind legs to deny it.

Posting rules. (#105790)
by Jordan

Maybe we need to change the Forvm colors to a nice, soothing blue....

--

Before you criticize someone, you should walk a mile in their shoes. That way when you criticize them, you're a mile away and you have their shoes. -JH

Habits are hard to break it appears (#105788)
by Macallan

"let someone braver than you get on his hind legs to deny it."

That's intentional parody?

--

“I serve as a blank screen on which people of vastly different political stripes project their own views.”

Actually, both of you need to work on cutting out the attacks (#105782)
by Username

Not good for one's health. It's all fun and games until somebody kills Kierkegaard.

Hey, leave me out of this...;) (#105813)
by Kierkegaard

I just wrote the diary...I thought we could all agree at least that he didn't deserve a horrible death. Guess I was wrong. If he were a personal friend maybe my heart-rate would be over the top. As it is, if I'm gonna die at my keyboard, I hope it won't be for the sake of Bob Novak--I'd prefer it to be at the indifferent hands of some cruel college hoyden on #private on ircstorm.net ;)

Anyway, a final note to Blaise on the topic, then I'll retire from it: Novak, a convert to Catholicism, is, or at least fancies himself to be, a devout Christian. I know you to be. I'm sure you can find it in your heart to forgive his trespasses, at least in the context of what may now be his death sentence.

Canto XXXII (#105846)
by BlaiseP

Io avea già i capelli in mano avvolti,
e tratti glien’ avea più d’una ciocca,
latrando lui con li occhi in giù raccolti,

quando un altro gridò: «Che hai tu, Bocca?
non ti basta sonar con le mascelle,
se tu non latri? qual diavol ti tocca?».

«Omai», diss’ io, «non vo’ che più favelle,
malvagio traditor; ch’a la tua onta
io porterò di te vere novelle».

The moral character of politicians (#105746)
by Username

You're complaining about the wrong thing. A system that cannot cope with those willing to abuse it is doomed to fail.

Like newspapers (#105759)
by Kierkegaard

that don't print news? ;)

It's hard to say (#105786)
by HankP

maybe they looked into it and the informant is a known liar. Maybe some of the accusations don't hold up when compared to public records of where Edwards was. I don't know enough (or care enough) to look into it that deeply.

I have to say that assuming the truth of tabloid stories is a pretty thin reed to support the claims you are making.

--

I blame it all on the Internet

It's not news (#105773)
by Username

Even assuming that this is all true and that Edwards is a sleazebag, who cares? The current administration has proven that Americans will elect crooks, re-elect them, and allow them to do as they wish. At this point, does it really matter if a newspaper does its job or not?

Recent Diaries
Links

Conservative
Liberal
Moderate/Mixed/Non-Partisan
Non-Political/Reference

Related Sites -

Polisci Applied (Aaron)
Intrepid Liberal Journal (Intrepid Liberal)
Obsidian Wings (Bird Dog)
Open Hand/Open Eye (locutas)
Red State (Bird Dog)
Swords Crossed (brendanm98)
Wagster Speaks (Wagster)
WatchingAmerica (BlaiseP)
The Social Pathologist (TSP)

Foreign Affairs -

Abu Aardvark
'Aqoul
American Footprints
Council on Foreign Relations
CSIS
Democracy Arsenal
Intel Dump
The Fourth Rail
The Head Heeb
War and Piece

Politics -

Ace of Spades HQ
Andrew Sullivan
Balloon Juice
Belgravia Dispatch
Captain's Quarters
Crooked Timber
Curmudgeonly & Skeptical
Daily Kos
Democracy Arsenal
Eschaton
Firedoglake
Glenn Greenwald
Global Guerrillas
Hugh Hewitt
Instapundit
Jawa Report
Lawyers, Guns and Money
Liberals Against Terror
Matt Yglesias
Michael J. Totten
Michelle Malkin
Moon of Alabama
New America
OxBlog
Patterico
Political Animal
Political Wire
Publius Pundit
QandO
Reality Based Community
Talking Points Memo
The Agitator
The Belmont Club
The Corner
Truman Project
Winds of Change.net

War -

Counterterrorism Blog
Iraq the Model
Jihad Watch
Small Wars Journal Blog

Economics and Business -

Angry Bear
Brad DeLong
Daniel Drezner
Mahalanobis
Marginal Revolution
Roubini Global Economics
The Big Picture

Science and Tech -

Bad Astronomy
New Scientist
Real Climate
Science Blogs
Scientific American
The Panda's Thumb

Legal -

Balkinization
Conglomerate
Ideoblog
Jurisdynamics
Law and Letters
Overlawyered
ProfessorBainbridge
ScotusBlog
Talk Left
The Becker-Posner Blog
Volokh Conspiracy

Sports -

Baseball Crank
Baseball Musings
Baseball Reference.com
ESPN.com
NFL.com
Only Baseball Matters
The Sports Economist

Books, Film and Music -

Amazon.com
Internet Movie Database
All Music Guide

News and Aggregators -

Asia Times
Boingboing
CNN
Digg
English Russia
Fark
Los Angeles Times
Memeorandum
MSNBC
Politico
Poynteronline
Slashdot
The New York Times
The Washington Post

References -

Wikipedia
Your Dictionary