Mid-Week Open Thread


Yep. Another one.
--

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
Josh Trevino can't bring himself to vote for McCain (#129042)
by HankP


He ended up writing in Bobby Jindal, who I think is going to wind up being the Mike Huckabee of the next few Presidential races, but without the personality.

I'd be interested in a headcount here, how many conservatives or nominal Republicans feel the same way?

--

I blame it all on the Internet

"Good citizenship demands voting as if it matters" (#129043)
by Spartacvs

So, my choice for President in 2008, scrawled in my ballot as an act of futile protest, is Governor Bobby Jindal of Louisiana.

What gives?

Invalidating your ballot is good citizenship and constitues voting as if it matters?

--

GW Bush, leading contender for worst President ever.

It's easy (#129044)
by Pranky

to take the moral high ground position and look like the pious common sense type if your candidate is getting creamed in your state.

Well, it is one less vote for McCain (#129046)
by HankP

but your point is fair, due to our electoral college setup his vote really doesn't matter in CA.

I do think it says something that there appear to be many conservatives who just can't vote for McCain/Palin, which is why I asked for a headcount. I'm guessing that there will be some surprises among forvm regulars.

--

I blame it all on the Internet

On Greenspan, economists + psychologists (#128852)
by catchy

An excerpt from a profanity-laced, ill-tempered rant, but here are the good bits:

...The way to handle economists and financiers is to let them fight it out among themselves until there’s only one left alive, and then kill him or her....

5. Greenspan was a genius until he wasn’t, but he may still be a genius who’s just decided to burn us. He apparently did his best to throw one or two Presidential elections to the Republicans, but he’s non-partisan because the Republicans are too liberal for him. During his unelected tenure, if he wasn’t the second most important official in American government it was because he was the most important. ...

6. Likewise, economics is a powerful science until it isn’t — i.e., until the bubble pops. Bubbles are psychological in origin (and thus of no concern to economists), so it’s up to the psychologists to explain them. They can’t do it, though, because they’re losers and only slightly less worthless than sociologists. Economists are the only real social scientists, but they have to rely on those other guys who always [screw] everything up...

http://trollblog.wordpress.com/2008/10/07/peasant-wisdom-about-the-collapse-of-western-civilization/

Where's Jerome Corsi these days you ask? (#128837)
by catchy

Detained in Kenya:

The American author of a best-selling book attacking Barack Obama is being detained in Kenya because he does not have a work permit, a senior immigration official said Tuesday

Yay!

wait. Maybe he's being deprived of his civil liberties and we shouldn't wish that on anyone.

OTOH, perhaps the Kenyan government is operating w/in letter of the law and if anyone has shown he intends to operate w/in the letter vs. standards of common decency it's Corsi.

Yay!

http://www.salon.com/wires/ap/world/2008/10/07/D93LHI300_af_kenya_obama_author_detained/index.html

I'm sure (#128857)
by HankP

he'll be writing about how Obama used his Kenyan connections to get Corsi gang-raped in a Kenyan prison.

--

I blame it all on the Internet

Republican admin. partially nationalizes banking industry (#128754)
by catchy

It's the New New Deal. The Newer Deal?

What should they be called: Roosevelt Republicans? Hank Franklin Paulsonvelts? Delano Bushlinroos?

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/27123491

It's looking like the American gov. will own banks, insurance cos + major car manufacturers by the time of the election. Wow.

I'm sorry, I know it shouldn't be, but this is funny. (#128756)
by stillnotking

The Dow dropped a little over 100 points while [Paulson] was speaking.

--

The other day I heard that ignorance and apathy are sweeping the country. I didn't know that, but I don't really care.

I know I have faith in Paulson (#128760)
by catchy

He's been so on top of all this. And didn't he work for Goldman Sachs?

Roubini's Recs:

At this point severe damage is done and one cannot rule out a systemic collapse and a global depression. It will take a significant change in leadership of economic policy and very radical, coordinated policy actions among all advanced and emerging market economies to avoid this economic and financial disaster

Including:

- another rapid round of policy rate cuts of the order of at least 150 basis points on average globally;

- a temporary blanket guarantee of all deposits while a triage between insolvent financial institutions that need to be shut down and distressed but solvent institutions that need to be partially nationalized with injections of public capital is made;

- a rapid reduction of the debt burden of insolvent households preceded by a temporary freeze on all foreclosures;

- massive and unlimited provision of liquidity to solvent financial institutions;

- public provision of credit to the solvent parts of the corporate sector to avoid a short-term debt refinancing crisis for solvent but illiquid corporations and small businesses;

- a massive direct government fiscal stimulus packages that includes public works, infrastructure spending, unemployment benefits, tax rebates to lower income households and provision of grants to strapped and crunched state and local government;

- a rapid resolution of the banking problems via triage, public recapitalization of financial institutions and reduction of the debt burden of distressed households and borrowers;

- an agreement between lender and creditor countries running current account surpluses and borrowing and debtor countries running current account deficits to maintain an orderly financing of deficits and a recycling of the surpluses of creditors to avoid a disorderly adjustment of such imbalances.

"Nostrobamus." (#128686)
by Bill White


--

Fence post turtles -- They don't get up there by themselves, some moron had to put 'em there.

Obama was right, and I was wrong. (#128723)
by stillnotking

I genuinely did not believe McCain would go one hundred percent negative at any point in this campaign. The fact that he is doing it so ineptly and with such poor timing is at least vindication of my general thesis that he sucks eggs as a campaigner, though.

--

The other day I heard that ignorance and apathy are sweeping the country. I didn't know that, but I don't really care.

Didn't they run out of sharks to jump? (#128651)
by otmar

FOX news on the newsweek cover:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YInuTc3C3jM

sheesh.

--

Dein Grundsatz war, z'erst überleg'n, / a Meinung hab'n, dahinterstehn / Niemals Gewalt, alles bereden / Aber auch ka Angst vor irgendwem -- STS

It's especially funny (#128684)
by stillnotking

coming from the network that did this:

--

The other day I heard that ignorance and apathy are sweeping the country. I didn't know that, but I don't really care.

I know exactly how they did that (#128688)
by catchy

They put those images in the 'beautification engine' in reverse. Here's when it's going forward:

http://www.nytimes.com/2008/10/09/fashion/09skin.html?_r=3&8dpc=&oref=slogin&pagewanted=all&oref=slogin

A Question for you investors... (#128628)
by Davinci

The market is at five year lows it may go down a bit more but from my view we are looking at a bottom coming soon. I have been looking at morning star for the first time is it worth it to have a subscription to a service like this..

Now a couple of other questions. We have a RothIRA account that is sitting in cash at the moment. Since we are going to be long term investors do would we be better in funds, stable long-term stocks, etc. I understand a reluctance to get to into specifics but what kind of recommendations on advisement , etc. The investment sector is a bit unnerving considering their current track record. I also don't want to be loaded down with fees. I am not against paying for sound management but don't want to be taken advantage of. What is the book to read on this stuff for the long term? It seems that much of the selling we have seen is related to Lehman liquidation and hedge and mutual funds settling for the end of the year. I am looking at putting our money in next week if I get a since that we are close to the bottom in some undervalued stocks with growth potential.

Any help in general would be appreciated...

Thank you
Da...

--

Ask courageous questions. Do not be satisfied with superficial answers. Be open to wonder and at the same time subject all claims to knowledge, without exception, to intense skeptical scrutiny. Be aware of human fallibility. Cherish your species and your

Take free advice for what it's worth (#128706)
by HankP

but unless you think you can call the bottom in this market, cash is a safe place to be until some of these very serious problems get sorted out.

--

I blame it all on the Internet

Bicycle companies? :) (#128647)
by Punditus Maximus

-nt-

--

It's impossible to debate if people simply hold beliefs that have no grounding in reality.

Stay out of this market for now. I like muni bonds (#128640)
by BlaiseP

in the current market: they're usually tax-free. Keep a weather eye out for green tech companies, but don't invest just yet. The next administration will be pushing through huge green tech investments, that's what I'm looking at just now.

The dollar is rising: cash or near-cash positions look best. But don't take me seriously, I'm the biggest vulture investor on the block. I've been short CBOT corn for a month and it's been really good for me.

On a side note this was funny.....Bank of Jamaica two cents (#128631)
by Davinci

http://bigpicture.typepad.com/comments/2008/10/chill-out.html

--

Ask courageous questions. Do not be satisfied with superficial answers. Be open to wonder and at the same time subject all claims to knowledge, without exception, to intense skeptical scrutiny. Be aware of human fallibility. Cherish your species and your

Not to be Serious, But there is there is Talk of Closing.... (#128608)
by Traveller

...world markets next week.

We argue while Rome burns?

It's getting spooky, Gentlemen, spooky.

http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601087&sid=aP5mpMUORBWM

Traveller

There's also been talk of closing (#128619)
by catchy

Berlusconi's fat mouth.

Interesting (#128605)
by trouscaillon

A bit surprised to see this today. Is this new? I was curious what he was saying on Prop. 8 (typically wrong, but oh well) and stumbled across it...

Christopher Buckley (#128572)
by Pranky
If You Ask Ronald Reagan Jr., He Probably Will Too -nt- (#128702)
by M Scott Eiland

--

Are you already (#128732)
by Pranky

into the 'no true Scotsman' argument here, after so much silence?

Ron Reagan Jr. doesn't write for National Review nt (#128704)
by HankP

--

I blame it all on the Internet

Nepotism Hath Its Privileges -nt- (#128708)
by M Scott Eiland

--

True. (#128733)
by Pranky

GW Bush, Jonah Goldberg, etc.

One of these things is not like another (#128721)
by HankP

Reagan Jr. has always been a liberal, Buckley Jr. has always been a conservative. You can spin it any way you want, but there are quite a few conservatives who have been quite dismayed and even disgusted by McCain's campaign.

I'm guessing that several of the silent conservatives here would admit to the same if they were willing to commit to an opinion rather than keeping their options open.

--

I blame it all on the Internet

Ouch (#128568)
by M Scott Eiland

South Park is back, and those guys Lucas and Spielberg probably wish it wasn't.

--

I assumed from the subject line (#128569)
by hobbesist

... that you were writing about this. So close!

--

Brevis esse laboro, obscurus fio.

Annoying, But Not Fatal (#128571)
by M Scott Eiland

The Dodgers will still be in good shape if they can win tonight. Down 2-0 will be another matter, though.

--

Well, I'm not entirely sure *when* (#128611)
by hobbesist

... the Phillies will dash my hopes, but I'm pretty certain that they will. So even if they win again this afternoon: keep the faith, man.

--

Brevis esse laboro, obscurus fio.

The consumption compromise (#128537)
by Bill White

Link

Until recently, many observers, most of them on the left, have puzzled over why rising inequality hasn't sparked an outright political revolt. Well, here's why. Real income matters less than quality of life. And for the last two decades, a delicate Consumption Compromise has tamped down economic discontent among working-class voters by driving down the cost of living—we've been living in the era of cheap food, cheap gas, cheap credit, and, of course, cheap Chinese-made goods.

We have also borrowed heavily to finance consumption. And the time to pay up is coming.

From 2000 to 2005, mean real money earnings rose for the four percent of the U.S. electorate that has professional graduate degrees and doctorates; all other groups saw a decrease. That's right: college graduates saw their mean real money earnings decline, and there was even sharper backsliding among those with less education. At the same time, the democratization of finance allowed consumption smoothing—spend tomorrow's money today—and the quality of consumer goods improved. Granted, this was small solace, but it gave a large number of Americans the sense that they were making economic progress.

During the same period, better-off workers—those in the top tenth—were hit by a spike in the cost of living. Two University of Chicago economists, Christian Broda and John Romalis, have looked at the inflation rates of consumer goods for the top tenth and the bottom tenth of American households. Because poor families spend a larger share of their income on tradable goods —think of the imported goods you find at Wal-Mart or Target— they've profited tremendously from free trade. Rich families spend a bigger share of their income on non-tradable services—hiring help, eating out, etc. As a result, the rich experienced a much higher effective inflation rate than the poor between 1994 and 2005. If ever you wonder why the populism of Al Gore or John Edwards resonated with affluent voters more than with the working class, look for the beginnings of an answer right there.

Uh oh . . .

I cannot see an easy solution to these convergences.

--

Fence post turtles -- They don't get up there by themselves, some moron had to put 'em there.

Joe Biden Is Funny (#128473)
by Harley

“Sarah Palin says, 'You know, I was in second grade when Joe Biden was elected to the United States Senate at age 29,’” he said this afternoon. “That’s true, but she was in sixth grade the last time John had a new idea.”

One side makin' with the jokes. While the other seethes.

--

To think is not enough; you must think of something -- Jules Renard

The nailing-jello-to-the-wall thing was a joke (#128475)
by stillnotking

I think.

--

The other day I heard that ignorance and apathy are sweeping the country. I didn't know that, but I don't really care.

You know... (#128480)
by Wagster

John McCain is pretty funny for a politician. I've seen him go on Letterman or Stewart and really have a ball. But in the debates he was so wound-up and nervous, every one of his jokes fell so flat you just had to feel sorry for him.

--

More Wagster!

Canada banking system fine (#128449)
by catchy

According to finance minister Flaherty strict regulation partially explains their health:

"We required them... to maintain the appropriate capital requirements and raise capital as necessary, which was done months ago."

Flaherty declined to say which banks were involved in shoring up capital to meet the government's standards. However, CIBC (TSX:CM), which has had to write off billions of dollars linked to the sub-prime and battered debt market in the U.S., raised $2.75 billion earlier this year by selling stock at a sharp discount.

...

Canadian borrowers must put down at least five per cent of the cost of a home and the maximum payback period on federally insured mortgages has been reduced to 35 years from 40 years, lowering the risk of defaults.

Sounds nice and everything, but of course we could never have effective governmental oversight like that here.

In this country government is the problem.

A Canadian friend once explained the difference between us... (#128451)
by athenas owl

Canada and the US. Down here, it's "Live Free or die", up there it's "Peace, order and good governance"...and the mindsets that follow these slogans.

Hmmm how about we compare female authors (#128454)
by catchy

Down here we read Ayn Rand; up north they're reading Margaret Atwood.

Ayn Rand? Speak for yourself (#128455)
by HankP

I could never read her turgid prose.

--

I blame it all on the Internet

More republican fun (#128447)
by Pranky

Why so angry?

An ugly, ugly crowd. Is this really what the republicans have become? A month to go. How long before the pitchforks, torches and nooses come out?

It is what they have always been. (#128499)
by Punditus Maximus

People don't "become" this.

--

It's impossible to debate if people simply hold beliefs that have no grounding in reality.

Like during the 1860s? -nt- (#128570)
by Jordan

.

--

Before you criticize someone, you should walk a mile in their shoes. That way when you criticize them, you're a mile away and you have their shoes. -JH

Kind of, yeah. (#128588)
by Punditus Maximus

The problem was always there; the South was always horrifically brutal. What changed was that the North became slowly aware of how simultaneously awful and economically unviable slavery had become.

If you look at the debate over slavery in the late 1700s, it was pretty much assumed that it would die out over time. It was the South's refusal to move organically to a new system that caused the problem.

--

It's impossible to debate if people simply hold beliefs that have no grounding in reality.

And Then The Cotton Gin Was Invented (#129040)
by M Scott Eiland

Slavery was still a crappy system in economic terms compared to industrial capitalism after that, but it wasn't clearly doomed in the relatively short run, as it was before 1792. If the Constitution had been written only a few years later, the clause allowing the 1808 ban on the slave trade would probably have been a deal breaker for the South; as it was, they went along with the bargain they struck in spite of the continued semi-viability of the slave system, but they probably regretted that bargain.

--

And so.... (#128691)
by Jordan

neither party has a lock on either bigotry or violence? So we can actually have an adult conversation about what is wrong with each "side"?

--

Before you criticize someone, you should walk a mile in their shoes. That way when you criticize them, you're a mile away and you have their shoes. -JH

The South runs on bigotry. (#128934)
by Punditus Maximus

Whoever works to reform it is on the side of decency. Whoever works to exploit it isn't.

--

It's impossible to debate if people simply hold beliefs that have no grounding in reality.

Plenty of bigotry up here in the north. (#129033)
by Jordan

I agree 100% with your reformers/exploiters sentiment.

--

Before you criticize someone, you should walk a mile in their shoes. That way when you criticize them, you're a mile away and you have their shoes. -JH

Acorn caused Wall Street to crash! (#128450)
by athenas owl

Or something like that...

LOL

I also love how people who are clearly not at work are telling other people clearly not at work to "Get a job"...

Other than that...sad.

Obama purchases 1/2 hour of network prime time (#128400)
by Bill White

Link

Barack Obama has purchased a half-hour of airtime on CBS, sources confirm.

The Obama campaign will air a half-hour primetime special on Wednesday, Oct. 29, at 8 p.m.

Sources say the Obama camp is also in talks with NBC and Fox. NBC is said to be very near a deal. With Fox, the matter is likely to remain uncertain as the time period could conflict with Game 6 of the World Series.

September must have been a very good fund raising month.

I guess I really need a new TV now . . .

--

Fence post turtles -- They don't get up there by themselves, some moron had to put 'em there.

A Halloween special! nt (#128405)
by HankP

--

I blame it all on the Internet

TV purchase information request (#128303)
by Bill White

My local electronics store sent me an e-mail (well, me and a few zillion other people) offering what seems like a very nice deal on a 55 inch Olevia 255T FHD LCD TV.

I would kinda like a new TV in time for Election Night coverage.

Any thoughts on this particular TV?

--

Fence post turtles -- They don't get up there by themselves, some moron had to put 'em there.

The Olevia (sp?) has gotten good reviews in the AV mags (#128503)
by tomsyl

but I personally have never seen one. I spent three years picking the right TV at the right price, and ultimately decided on a 65" rear-projection DLP Mitsubishi with 1080p and multiple HDMI inputs, both essential IMO. It beat all of the LCDs except the much more expensive Sony Bravia and Samsung in terms of picture detail and off-axis viewing. Take a small magnifying glass with you and look at the screen image close-up to see whether the individual scan lines are thin and crisp, not blurred.

I ended up paying $1700 for the Mitsubishi locally, delivered. I would not buy through the mail, particularly an LCD or plasma TV, which is essentially worthless if the screen cracks. You need to be able to threaten a local service rep if you have problems down the road, and mailing a 55" screen back to the vendor is not practical.

WRT the TV itself, the color and contrast will likely be way off as received, so get a good alignment DVD when you get the TV. Also, you will tire of the set's built-in audio quickly if it has same, so plan on laying out another $3-400 or so for an external surround sound system. More on that later if you want it.

--

Even a dead midget is far from light. - Confucius

I'd recommend (#128339)
by HankP

looking into DLP TVs - they've really advanced the technology and the 1080P sets I've seen are very, very good and a LOT less than LCD or plasma models. LINK

--

I blame it all on the Internet

Best bet is to go price them at say Best buy or Nebraska (#128315)
by Davinci

Furnature mart. If you have those stores or comparable ones and have the TV guys give you the run down. Then go look at it and make a choice....

--

Ask courageous questions. Do not be satisfied with superficial answers. Be open to wonder and at the same time subject all claims to knowledge, without exception, to intense skeptical scrutiny. Be aware of human fallibility. Cherish your species and your

check also newegg and amazon (#128479)
by Username
Say It To My Face, B*tch (#128277)
by Harley

This is gonna get fun.


Tom Vilsack and other surrogates were out saying the same thing today. So are the cable pundits. If the Ayers connection is worth driving hooples into a racist/xenophobic frenzy at the rallies, why wasn't it worth bringing up at the town hall?

In other words, they're calling McCain a coward. And given his temperament, given how unstable he's been the last few weeks, one can only imagine how this will impact the roiling, seething mass of resentments he has become.

The only question now, is: when does he blow? I figured he'd play Good Cop in the last debate. But given how desperate he is, and given this? I think the odds just went up that he goes postal on national television. Which would be cool.

--

To think is not enough; you must think of something -- Jules Renard

McCain's response (#128448)
by stillnotking

Hey, it just never came up:

GIBSON: You didn't raise that, this argument, this argument, or line of argument, at the debate the other night. And I asked Sen. Obama about that yesterday. He said yeah, I'm surprised that John didn't say that to my face.

MCCAIN: Again, two things I've never been accused of lacking. And one is passion, and the other is courage. I mean, I can accept a lot of the other criticisms. It didn't come up in the flow of the conversation. But it did come up, and I pointed out that he asked for $3 million for an overhead projector at a planetarium in his hometown of Chicago.

I didn't have the stones to bring up Ayers, but by golly I gave him what-for about that planetarium. (Where's the planetarium ad, Senator?)

Edit: by the way, Gibson's question has an obvious answer, which is that the McCain campaign doesn't want to give Obama a chance to directly refute the Ayers charges in a public forum. It's not a question of courage but of efficacy. McCain would cheerfully wrestle a grizzly if he thought it would get him the Presidency of the United States.

--

The other day I heard that ignorance and apathy are sweeping the country. I didn't know that, but I don't really care.

Whoo, Boy (#128348)
by Harley

Biden gets in on the act:

"All of the things they said about Barack Obama in the TV, on the TV, at their rallies, and now on YouTube ... John McCain could not bring himself to look Barack Obama in the eye and say the same things to him ... In my neighborhood, when you've got something to say to a guy, you look him in the eye and you say it to him."

McCain's gonna blow. It's only a matter of time.

--

To think is not enough; you must think of something -- Jules Renard

Harley thought you might like this one... (#128295)
by Davinci


--

Ask courageous questions. Do not be satisfied with superficial answers. Be open to wonder and at the same time subject all claims to knowledge, without exception, to intense skeptical scrutiny. Be aware of human fallibility. Cherish your species and your

A Very Nice Smackdown nt (#128320)
by Harley

--

To think is not enough; you must think of something -- Jules Renard

Ayers she blows, Cap'n - - Mt McCain off the port bow! (#128281)
by Bill White

Steady boys, steady now!

--

Fence post turtles -- They don't get up there by themselves, some moron had to put 'em there.

Nate Silver now says 25% chance of 60 Dems in Senate (#128244)
by Bill White

McCain's coat tails continue to shrink

--

Fence post turtles -- They don't get up there by themselves, some moron had to put 'em there.

Does this improve Joe Lieberman's (#128247)
by Spartacvs

chances for a stay of execution and a welcome back into the fold?

--

GW Bush, leading contender for worst President ever.

Is This The Last Straw? (#128183)
by Harley

Brad Delong looks at the numbers on McCain's latest, and perhaps last, Hail Mary.

The McCain plan is:

Take $300 billion.

Pay double current market value to banks that have troubled mortgages on their books, thus:

- Give a present of $100 billion to the bankers who made the loans.
- Acquire and regularize the mortgages of only two-thirds as many homeowners as could have been accomplished if the $300 billion were invested wisely.

There's a big difference here: Democrats want to prevent depression and support the financial markets by investing taxpayer money in banks with troubled assets. Republicans want to give taxpayers money away to the shareholders and managers of banks with troubled assets.

I would say that this is unbelievable, but I do believe it.

--

To think is not enough; you must think of something -- Jules Renard

Obama video crushes McCain mortgage plan (#128186)
by Bill White

Tampa Bay Tribune:

McCain told us he could fix bad mortgages with a snap of his fingers, fix health care at no net cost, and maintain the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan, all while cutting taxes. He tried to reassure us about Osama bin Laden, saying, "I know how to get him."

On the looming problem of how to pay for the nation's over-promised retirement program, McCain said, "It's not that hard to fix Social Security."

Of course it's going to be hard.

--

Fence post turtles -- They don't get up there by themselves, some moron had to put 'em there.

Let them eat… (#128179)
by Sulla

cat.

--

"That Sam-I-am! That Sam-I-am! I do not like that Sam-I-am!"- Dr. Seuss

PETA (#128251)
by Weyland

People Eating Tasty Animals

--

For having lived long, I have experienced many instances of being obliged, by better information or fuller consideration, to change opinions, even on important subjects, which I once thought right but found to be otherwise - B. Franklin

Old Dude Flip Out (#128178)
by Harley

via Michael Kinsley:

McCain’s game is craps. So is Jeff Dearth’s. Jeff was at the table when McCain showed up and happily made room for him. Apparently there is some kind of rule or tradition in craps that everyone’s hands are supposed to be above the table when the dice are about to be thrown. McCain—“very likely distracted by one of the many people who approached him that evening,” Jeff says charitably—apparently was violating this rule. A small middle-aged woman at the table, apparently a “regular,” reached out and pulled McCain’s arm away. I’ll let Jeff take over the story:
“McCain immediately turned to the woman and said between clenched teeth: ‘DON’T TOUCH ME.’ The woman started to explain...McCain interrupted her: ‘DON’T TOUCH ME,’ he repeated viciously. The woman again tried to explain. ‘DO YOU KNOW WHO I AM? DO YOU KNOW WHO YOU’RE TALKING TO?’ McCain continued, his voice rising and his hands now raised in the ‘bring it on’ position. He was red-faced. By this time all the action at the table had stopped. I was completely shocked. McCain had totally lost it, and in the space of about ten seconds. ‘Sir, you must be courteous to the other players at the table,’ the pit boss said to McCain. “DO YOU KNOW WHO I AM? ASK ANYBODY AROUND HERE WHO I AM.”
This being Puerto Rico, the pit boss might not have known McCain. But the senator continued in full fury—“DO YOU KNOW WHO YOU’RE TALKING TO? DO YOU KNOW WHO I AM?”—and crisis was avoided only when Jeff offered to change places and stand between McCain and the woman who had touched his arm.

The entire piece is here.

--

To think is not enough; you must think of something -- Jules Renard

"Are you Rick James, b*tch?" nt (#128252)
by stillnotking

.

--

The other day I heard that ignorance and apathy are sweeping the country. I didn't know that, but I don't really care.

No! Old Gregg! (#128276)
by BlaiseP

Old Gregg for those who aren't up on this Mighty Booshism. Here's a sample.

"More of a 70-30 split; whatever the percentage he's one fishy b*stard."

hilarious (#128334)
by heet

Everyone watch all the youtube videos. They are deliciously crazy.

--

Over here on E Street, we're proud to support Obama for President. - Bruce Springsteen

No "flip out", Harley (#128189)
by Jay C

That's only for Democrats! I recall quite clearly that four years back, John Kerry's reported use of the "DO YOU KNOW WHO I AM?" line came in for a great of scorn/snark/mockery from the Tacitus commentariat - anxious to cite it as absolute proof of how "snooty", "arrogant", etc. Long John was (and of course, how this utterly and completely disqualified from any consideration of becoming President).

I wonder if this incident will generate a similar reaction? Or does IOKIYAR trump all?

BTW, Kerry at least mouthed off in a tony Boston(?) restaurant: somehow Angry John losing it in a Puerto Rican casino doesn't have quite the same cachet....

Why do you even have to ask? -nt- (#128259)
by Punditus Maximus

.

--

It's impossible to debate if people simply hold beliefs that have no grounding in reality.

I wonder... (#128175)
by aireachail

If I ever made it into this place, would I ever want to leave?

I'm fairly sure that I'd have to be escorted out.

--

Excess on occasion is exhilarating. It prevents moderation from acquiring the deadening effect of a habit. - W. Somerset Maugham

Heaven (#128519)
by ak77

My exact same thoughts.

George F. Will: McCain and his female Sancho Panza (#128168)
by Bill White

His female Sancho Panza?

George, George George shouldn't it be: Sancha Panza?

Anyway, once I learned a little bit abut Sarah Palin, I figured that the East Coast establishment Republicans would seek to throw their own ticket under the bus, soon enough. After all, how can they possibly control a genuine populist such as Palin?

And thus George F. Will writes this sentence:

Recently Obama noted -- perhaps to torment and provoke conservatives -- that McCain's rhetoric about Wall Street's "greed" and "casino culture" amounted to "talking like Jesse Jackson."

Indeed! Barack Obama mocks John McCain for talking too much like Jesse Jackson and George F. Will nods in agreement?

Too funny!

But the simple truth is that East Coast establishment Republicans have decided that Obama simply is more sane that John McCain. Or at least a safer bet in that regard.

George F. Will's closing paragraph:

In 1987, on the eve of Prime Minister Margaret Thatcher's third victory, the head of her Conservative Party told a visiting columnist: "Someday, Labour will win an election. Our job is to hold on until they are sane." Republicans, winners of seven of the last 10 presidential elections, had better hope they have held on long enough.

David Brooks
George F. Will
Charles Krauthammer
Kathleen Parker

Of course these folks are merely the bellwethers for the undisclosed opinions of the traditional GOP establishment and yet the signals being sent by these folks plainly suggest the East Coast old guard GOP wishes to wash its hands of McCain & Palin.

--

Fence post turtles -- They don't get up there by themselves, some moron had to put 'em there.

A Few Clickable Images... (#128164)
by Traveller
Very nice, Trav. (#128341)
by mmghosh

Whats the story about the monk?

Alas, mmghosh, There is NO Special Story...(Indo-China) (#128388)
by Traveller

...as with the best things in life, a person simply doing what they are supposed to do.

A small irrigation pump will burn out unless properly submerged, Monk rides up on his bicycle and checks the pump periodically.

As he should.

(Very strong Indian influence EVERYWHERE...thanks for getting me attuned to look for this!)

It ain't called Indo (Indian) China for nothin`, there is a reason for this name, and the reason is to be seen everywhere and in most everything.

Best Wishes, Traveller

beautiful! (#128199)
by heet

The great thing about Thailand and Cambodia photography is if you get your shots at a good time of day, everything looks freaking amazing. I got completely lost in taking photos of every nook and cranny at the Wats.

--

Over here on E Street, we're proud to support Obama for President. - Bruce Springsteen

And now, from the Keepin' Us Safe Department (#128162)
by BlaiseP

We learn that DHS is now keepin' us Safer than Ever!

WASHINGTON -- The Department of Homeland Security will proceed with the first phase of a controversial satellite-surveillance program, even though an independent review found the department hasn't yet ensured the program will comply with privacy laws.

Congress provided partial funding for the program in a little-debated $634 billion spending measure that will fund the government until early March. For the past year, the Bush administration had been fighting Democratic lawmakers over the spy program, known as the National Applications Office.

The program is designed to provide federal, state and local officials with extensive access to spy-satellite imagery -- but no eavesdropping -- to assist with emergency response and other domestic-security needs, such as identifying where ports or border areas are vulnerable to terrorism.

Since the department proposed the program a year ago, several Democratic lawmakers have said that turning the spy lens on America could violate Americans' privacy and civil liberties unless adequate safeguards were required.

-snip-

California Rep. Jane Harman, who heads a homeland-security subcommittee on intelligence, said that even limited funding allows the department to launch the program, providing a platform to expand its surveillance whether or not privacy requirements are met.

"Having learned my lesson" with the National Security Agency's warrantless-surveillance program, she said, "I don't want to go there again unless and until the legal framework for the entire program is entirely spelled out."

Rep. Thompson vowed to fight expansion of the program until privacy issues are further addressed.

Well, that just gives me a Warm Fuzzy Feeling. How 'bout you? Yes, it's new and improved and all powered up. Our ever-so trustworthy good buddies at DHS are ready and willing to assist anyone who might need to know Stuff About Us.

I am put in mind of that bit of the Sermon on the Mount: Are not two sparrows sold for a farthing? and one of them shall not fall on the ground without your Father.

What Sound. . . (#128156)
by M Scott Eiland

. . .do little ACORNs make when they're thrown under the tires of the Obama campaign bus? We'll know soon.

--

ACORN Will Save You, I Know It Will! (#128180)
by Harley

And on the day that the NY Times breaks the story about tens of thousands of voters being accidentally dropped from the rolls due to a bureaucratic error.

Gosh. A hundred bad forms in Missouri? Alert the Wingtards!

--

To think is not enough; you must think of something -- Jules Renard

Punditus Max: (#128185)
by Jay C

And btw: a LINK HERE to the NYT piece on the -possibly illegal - voter purges in various states.

The foofaraw over the Las Vegas ACORN raid seems to have been animated less by the usual partisan animus (in this case): the Nevada officials behind it are apparently Democrats. Still smells funny though.

Okay, I'm actually awake now. (#128260)
by Punditus Maximus

I'll pay attention, though of course the patently illegal Republican voter suppression efforts make anything ACORN could have done look like some guy sneaking in an extra ballot.

--

It's impossible to debate if people simply hold beliefs that have no grounding in reality.

And There's a Larger Problem (#128223)
by Harley

Republicans are running around with their hair on fire -- and in fairness, I understand why -- trying to nail Obama thru various associations. Ayers, ACORN, etc.

While Obama is nailing McCain on his own actions, eg the weirdo mortgage bailout.

One of those methods is far more effective than the other.

--

To think is not enough; you must think of something -- Jules Renard

Did you hear the story about the Vegas office? (#128176)
by dionysus

Now, I never heard of ACORN before this election and probably won't hear much of them after, but apparently they had been reporting every single fraudulent registration that they identified to the proper authorities, and the authorities never even got back to them. Going back months.

Until this week. When they used those fraudulent registrations, submitted voluntarily, to get a search warrant and raid the acorn office. Like, what? Couldn't be a coincidence, right?

M. Scott, the ACORN argument boils down to (#128165)
by Bill White

a desperate primal scream that folks need to vote for John McCain because Democrats are evil, nasty bad people.

George F. Will (of all people) has this pegged:

In the closing days of his 10-year quest for the presidency, McCain finds it galling that Barack Obama is winning the first serious campaign he has ever run against a Republican. Before Tuesday night's uneventful event, gall was fueling what might be the McCain-Palin campaign's closing argument. It is less that Obama has bad ideas than that Obama is a bad person.

. . . ACORN, Ayers, Islamic mole . . .

"Barack Obama is a BAD BAD BAD person and so are all Democrats!"

That is the sum and substance of the ACORN argument.

M. Scott, every time YOU post the word "ACORN" between now and 4 November 2008 I shall hear and recognize that primal scream of rage and frustration and you shall have my genuine condolences and empathy even as I become more convinced than ever that America truly needs to elect Barack Obama as our next President.

Cheers!

--

Fence post turtles -- They don't get up there by themselves, some moron had to put 'em there.

Wake me when... (#128160)
by Punditus Maximus

...it isn't exclusively Republican administrations and offices finding, somehow, that the registrations of poor folks should be rejected.

I mean, how could we have predicted that Republicans would seek to suppress the votes of the poor?

--

It's impossible to debate if people simply hold beliefs that have no grounding in reality.

I think it sounds like "Diebold-diebold-diebold-diebold-diebold" (#128157)
by BlaiseP

or something like that.

Or Michelle Obama yelling (#128158)
by Steve Peterson

Or Michelle Obama yelling "WHITEY!"

--

Steven Palmer Peterson