Who is "Joey Danko"?


Could he be the second cousin of “Donnie Darko”?

A show of hands, who hangs out at their local Home Depot?

Biden is a Constitutional Lawyer? If he is, you would assume he actually read the document with respect to the Constitutional authority of the Vice President. A far bigger gaffe than not being able to recite a SCOTUS decision.

Finally, Biden on Biden is self parody at its finest.

SEN. BIDEN: I think it is unconstitutional to say we’re going to tell you, “You can go, but we’re going to micromanage the war.” When we wrote the Constitution, the intention was to give the commander in chief the authority how to use the forces when you authorize him to be able to use the forces.

MR. RUSSERT: Aren’t you now micromanaging?

SEN. BIDEN: Not at all. Did you hear what I said? I said “how to use the forces.” We have authority to tell him how to use the forces. If you get in there, though, and once you tell him—we have, we have a responsibility to tell him what the mission is. He does not have the authority to engage in a mission of the use of our force in a country or out of a country that we do not authorize. And that’s the thrust of what we’re trying to do here. We’re trying to fundamentally change what this president is using our forces for. He’s in the midst of a civil war with the objective of—a flawed objective of establishing a strong central government. That will not happen, and we have an obligation to push back as much and as often and as thoroughly as we can.

MR. RUSSERT: But, senator, there has been an evolution in your thinking because this is what you said in—to the Brookings Institution in ‘05. “We can” tell it—“We can call it quits and withdraw [from Iraq]. I think that would be a gigantic mistake. Or we can set a deadline for pulling out, which I fear will only encourage our enemies to wait us out—equally a mistake.” You’re now setting a deadline.

SEN. BIDEN: No, we’re not setting a deadline. Read what it says. It says the target date, left up to the generals to determine whether or not it is appropriate to withdraw all forces.

MR. RUSSERT: Well, a target date is setting a deadline.

SEN. BIDEN: No, no, but it leaves forces behind. We’re trying to change the mission, Tim. The mission is all of us have been arguing one exception, in both parties, that you’re going to have to leave forces behind in Iraq while this new government—if we actually get one up and running—is trying to function and trying to set up. The—look, the problem here is this is also a moving target. I also called for more troops in Iraq. I called for more troops on this program a couple years ago. That was in order to stop a civil war. Once the civil war began I was on the program after that saying all the troops in the world cannot settle a civil war. So what I’m having to respond to, like everyone else, is the president’s initiatives and his failures that, that required difference circumstances and different answers at different times. But the fundamental principle’s the same: We have an obligation to tell the president of the United States if we disagree with the mission for which he’s using American forces. And the mission that he has us on is to settle a civil war through establishing a central democratic government in Baghdad. That mission is strategically flawed.

MR. RUSSERT: But you no longer have a problem setting a date for withdrawal.

SEN. BIDEN: I no longer have a problem setting a target, a target that is flexible. There is no—there’s nothing in it says that every troop has to be out on April the 1st.

MR. RUSSERT: You said this back in October of ‘02: “We must be clear with the American people that we are committing to Iraq for the long haul; not just the day after, but the decade after.” Do you believe we’ll be in Iraq for a decade?

SEN. BIDEN: I said back then, before we went to war, I wrote a report saying the decade after, and everyone was talking about the day after. And the point I was making was, if you went in and used force, which he should not have done when he did it, that we were committing and signing on to a decade. That was the—that was the minimum requirement. I also pointed out we needed more troops. I also pointed out at that time we would not be greeted with open arms. I also pointed out at that time oil would not pay for this. It was a warning, a warning to the president. “Mr. President, the objective of us giving you this authority is to get inspectors back in, bring the pressure of the world community—which remember, at the time, when we were sitting here talking about this, the—at that moment the issue was are we going to pull out of—are we going to lift sanctions on Iraq or are we going to put more sanctions on Iraq? That, that was the context in which that debate was taking place.

Joe is wrong about the context and substance of the debate, but no one should be surprised by that. Did, Joe's October 02 comments on the Act mention a decade of commitment, that our military wasn't ready or the cost of the conflict? I don't believe it did and that was the appropriate time to bring the issues up.

For Joe the Constitution is whatever he says it is, as the aforementioned details.

Finally, whatever happened to that "Civil War"?

--

"Making sure your tires are properly inflated, simple thing, but we could save all the oil that they're talking about getting off drilling, if everybody was just inflating their tires and getting regular tune-ups. You could actually save just as much." Ob

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
Okay, Google turns up nothing on Joey Danko. (#126412)
by BlaiseP

Maybe you'll be good enough to explain the reference, for it is lost on me.

As for micromanaging this war, I seem to recall the Continental Congress doing much the same to George Washington. Something of the kind happened to Nixon and Gerald Ford at the end of the Vietnam War.

Congress has the power to declare war. Your goddamn Imperial Executive is BS. Read Article 1, Section 8 of our Constitution, and you shall find within two remarkable bit of text:

To raise and support Armies, but no Appropriation of Money to that Use shall be for a longer Term than two Years

To make Rules for the Government and Regulation of the land and naval Forces;

In short, the Commander in Chief's wars are only empowered and continued through the oversight of Congress. A declaration of war did not trump the Senate in the Roman Republic and does not in ours. Now unless you want an American Caesar, please refrain from any of this hoo-hah about the Constitution Being Whatever Joe Says It Is. Joe Biden is a Senator and George Bush is not. A military commander, including the Commander in Chief, is restrained in his warmaking capacities by the Congress.

PS: Oh, that civil war business?

Of note, when we had the Continental Congress (#126658)
by Timmy the Wonder Dog

we didn't have Constitution.

Please note, that the Roman Republic didn't have a Constitution, either.

The open comment on micromanagement was made by Joe, himself. I hope you understand that.

In short, Congress has no oversight responsibility in the management of the war. The management of the government is left to the executive; I believe that it is often referred to as the "separation of powers", something you should probably ponder about.

Congress does, however, control the purse. That is, at anytime during the Iraqi conflict, Congress always had the opportunity by stop the conflict by ending the fundig of it. But then Congress would have owned the situation in that scenario.

--

"Making sure your tires are properly inflated, simple thing, but we could save all the oil that they're talking about getting off drilling, if everybody was just inflating their tires and getting regular tune-ups. You could actually save just as much." Ob

Biden's everyman example from the debate (#126607)
by Spartacvs

who according to Biden's anecdote didn't know how much it would cost to fill his gas tank because he couldn't afford to ever fill it.

Donnie Darko is a troubled teenager who appears to be suffering the symptoms of paranoid schizophrenia in the movie of the same name.

Gentlemen, you have your orders - let the kerning commence.

1st up, Curtis Sliwa investigates the countertops on display at the Home Depot in Wilmington and believes he has the goods to lay waste to the Biden anecdote.

--

GW Bush, leading contender for worst President ever.

Links

Conservative
Liberal
Moderate/Mixed/Non-Partisan
Non-Political/Reference

Related Sites -

Polisci Applied (Aaron)
Intrepid Liberal Journal (Intrepid Liberal)
Obsidian Wings (Bird Dog)
Open Hand/Open Eye (locutas)
Red State (Bird Dog)
Swords Crossed (brendanm98)
Wagster Speaks (Wagster)
WatchingAmerica (BlaiseP)
The Social Pathologist (TSP)

Foreign Affairs -

Abu Aardvark
'Aqoul
American Footprints
Council on Foreign Relations
CSIS
Democracy Arsenal
Intel Dump
The Fourth Rail
War and Piece

Politics -

Ace of Spades HQ
Andrew Sullivan
Balloon Juice
Belgravia Dispatch
Captain's Quarters
Crooked Timber
Curmudgeonly & Skeptical
Daily Kos
Democracy Arsenal
Eschaton
Firedoglake
Glenn Greenwald
Global Guerrillas
Hugh Hewitt
Instapundit
Jawa Report
Lawyers, Guns and Money
Liberals Against Terror
Matt Yglesias
Michael J. Totten
Michelle Malkin
Moon of Alabama
New America
OxBlog
Patterico
Political Animal
Political Wire
Publius Pundit
QandO
Reality Based Community
Talking Points Memo
The Agitator
The Belmont Club
The Corner
Truman Project
Winds of Change.net

War -

Counterterrorism Blog
Iraq the Model
Jihad Watch
Small Wars Journal Blog

Economics and Business -

Angry Bear
Brad DeLong
Daniel Drezner
Mahalanobis
Marginal Revolution
Roubini Global Economics
The Big Picture

Science and Tech -

Bad Astronomy
New Scientist
Real Climate
Science Blogs
Scientific American
The Panda's Thumb

Legal -

Balkinization
Conglomerate
Ideoblog
Jurisdynamics
Law and Letters
Overlawyered
ProfessorBainbridge
ScotusBlog
Talk Left
The Becker-Posner Blog
Volokh Conspiracy

Sports -

Baseball Crank
Baseball Musings
Baseball Reference.com
ESPN.com
NFL.com
Only Baseball Matters
The Sports Economist

Books, Film and Music -

Amazon.com
Internet Movie Database
All Music Guide

News and Aggregators -

Asia Times
Boingboing
CNN
Digg
English Russia
Fark
Los Angeles Times
Memeorandum
MSNBC
Politico
Poynteronline
Slashdot
The New York Times
The Washington Post

References -

Wikipedia
Your Dictionary