Obama makes an artful statement and then retreats


the "Stable Iraq" caveat followed by the yelping of his base and it is back to the withdrawal timetable.

Whoever is elected president this fall will face a stabilizing Iraq ( link and link) and an emerging Middle East democracy. An inartful statement here (similar to Truman on Korea) or an inartful action there (a premature withdrawal of Amercians) and poof devastation both domestically and geopolitically.

The stakes are clear but will the yelping prevail?

The title was edited pursuant to a reasonable request.

Update:

Andy notices the progress

We need to add all the usual caveats. This is Iraq. But if someone had told me a year ago that fifteen of eighteen benchmarks had been reached, that all the parties were in negotiation over future politics, that al Qaeda was close to dead at the hands of the US and the Iraqis, and that oil contracts were being handed out amid four-year lows in violence, I wouldn't have believed them..

but limits his exit scenario (you will need to read the link)to only one and he also fails to note how this was accomplished.
--

“Let us go forth to lead the land we love, asking His blessing and His help, but knowing that here on earth God’s work must truly be our own.”

John F. Kennedy

January 20, 1961

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
Obama makes an artful (#101970)
by Brooks and B Ra...

Obama makes an artful statement and then retreats

the "Stable Iraq" caveat followed by the yelping of his base and it is back to the withdrawal timetable.

Please provide quote and link re: the "retreat".

Oops. Looks like PM Maliki wants a timetable. (#101888)
by Jordan

http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20080707/ap_on_re_mi_ea/iraq

BAGHDAD - Iraq's prime minister said Monday his country wants some type of timetable for a withdrawal of American troops included in the deal the two countries are negotiating.

It was the first time that Prime Minister Nouri al-Maliki has explicitly and publicly called for a withdrawal timetable — an idea opposed by President Bush.

Now either Maliki can't wait for his country to descend into chaos once again, or he knows something we don't know about the efficacy of a large US troop presence. Either way, more egg for the Presidential visage.

--

Before you criticize someone, you should walk a mile in their shoes. That way when you criticize them, you're a mile away and you have their shoes. -JH

Didn't someone just say the first thing to do is to dump Maliki (#101913)
by tomsyl

because he's just a tool of the Bush Admin? C'mon, whoever that was, fess up - don't make me learn how to use the search function, please.

--

Even a dead midget is far from light. - Confucius

Quite the opposite, I seem to recall saying the exact opposite (#101967)
by BlaiseP

back here.

Maliki needs to be thrown overboard, he wants to swim.

As I see it, as long as the Americans are propping him up, he's seen as a stooge, a mere procurator. The reality on the ground in Iraq, as I understand it, is this: the Americans are in the back seat, and they like it that way. The more the Iraqis push back against us, the more viable they seem. We want them to push back. CENTCOM and State are acutely aware they won't get a pro-American regime in Iraq. At best it will be neutral and probably somewhat hostile. Iraqis have every reason to be sick and tired of the Americans at this point: we've overstayed our welcome for at least four years.

So yeah, we will withdraw from Iraq, and fairly quickly as these things go.

I believe you missed the "condition" caveat (#101890)
by Timmy

which is really what security agreements are all about.

--

“Let us go forth to lead the land we love, asking His blessing and His help, but knowing that here on earth God’s work must truly be our own.”
John F. Kennedy
January 20, 1961

I believe you missed the "no timetables" caveat (#101902)
by Jordan

which is the Bush position on the issue.

--

Before you criticize someone, you should walk a mile in their shoes. That way when you criticize them, you're a mile away and you have their shoes. -JH

If you understand the condition (#101904)
by Timmy

then you understand why the timetable isn't relevant.

--

“Let us go forth to lead the land we love, asking His blessing and His help, but knowing that here on earth God’s work must truly be our own.”
John F. Kennedy
January 20, 1961

so by 'non-western democracy' (#101908)
by catchy

you meant 'democracy whose sovereignty the US needn't respect'?

I thought we were there to engender their democratic process, not dismiss the results of said process as 'irrelevant'.

Once again (#101710)
by HankP

for reference. Funny how the conservatives either ignore this list or get all huffy and refuse to discuss it.

--

I blame it all on the Internet

Hank, I tried three links at random and they all were bogus, (#101928)
by tomsyl

either discussing events out of context, quoting anonymous sources, or simply opinionating without any cite or link. Check them out yourself:
Link.
Link.
Link.

Three strikes and you're out. I had the impression you were vouching for the accuracy of the list you keep posting, but apparently not. The list is the predictable result of a politicized, anti-McCain site linking to other politicized, anti-McCain sites: an echo chamber, where HuffyPost gets quoted as if it were a legitimate and objective news source instead of primal scream therapy for liberals.

I'm no McCain fan, and I have no doubt someone can come up with any number of contradictions in the positions he's taken over the years, the same way it could be done with any other pol who's been in office for more than a year or two. But it will have to be done a lot better than in your link before it's worth a serious response, IMO.

--

Even a dead midget is far from light. - Confucius

Funny, well we were never mesmerized like those who (#101727)
by Timmy

dwelled in the aura of Obama. We were pretty focused on certain issues and we understood where McCain was coming from.

Whereas, well Obama

Senator Barack Obama stirred his legions of supporters, and raised our hopes, promising to change the old order of things. He spoke with passion about breaking out of the partisan mold of bickering and catering to special pleaders, promised to end President Bush’s abuses of power and subverting of the Constitution and disowned the big-money power brokers who have corrupted Washington politics.

We are not shocked when a candidate moves to the center for the general election. But Mr. Obama’s shifts are striking because he was the candidate who proposed to change the face of politics, the man of passionate convictions who did not play old political games.

Hey, who do you think we will target if Obama pursues the Bush Doctrine in Iraq, FISA and Conservative Justices?

--

“Let us go forth to lead the land we love, asking His blessing and His help, but knowing that here on earth God’s work must truly be our own.”
John F. Kennedy
January 20, 1961

McCain's problem (#101733)
by HankP

isn't that he's moving to the center after the primary, it's that he's moving to the right. Mr. Third Term indeed.

I'm not sure who you're referring to as "dwelling in an aura", certainly not me.

But once again, good job avoiding that list, Mr. Waffle Diary!

--

I blame it all on the Internet

McCain has (was) always been in the center. (#101736)
by Timmy

After you spending link (which was an indepth talk about tax policy ), it is the only way I could explain it.

--

“Let us go forth to lead the land we love, asking His blessing and His help, but knowing that here on earth God’s work must truly be our own.”
John F. Kennedy
January 20, 1961

Ha (#101741)
by HankP

yes, on the Republican scale that puts John Birch at moderate right and Chuck Hegel at the far left.

Still avoiding those McCain waffles, though! Good job!

--

I blame it all on the Internet

Of note (#101715)
by Wagster

This is the proper response.

--

More Wagster!

Actually the proper response is (#101717)
by Timmy

1. National Security
2. Federal Judges (guns and child rapists)
3. Tax Policy
4. Free Trade and
5. Multi-faceted energy program

--

“Let us go forth to lead the land we love, asking His blessing and His help, but knowing that here on earth God’s work must truly be our own.”
John F. Kennedy
January 20, 1961

Back in the real world (#101723)
by HankP

1. More wars
2. Appeal to emotion
3. Run up the deficit
4. Any agreement that doesn't threaten high income voters
5. Drill, drill, drill

--

I blame it all on the Internet

Real World (#101730)
by Timmy

1. Fewer Wars
2. Straight Talk
3. Cut spending and taxes
4. Getting the people back to work
5. We can only hope.

--

“Let us go forth to lead the land we love, asking His blessing and His help, but knowing that here on earth God’s work must truly be our own.”
John F. Kennedy
January 20, 1961

Really lame (#101738)
by HankP

especially after controlling the government for four years. Even if I agreed with your goals, whatever would make one think that the Republicans will do anything about it? They're playing you for a sucker.

--

I blame it all on the Internet

actually the economy was moving along nicely until the Dems (#101743)
by Timmy

took control of Congress. I'm still waiting for the Dems to roll out their energy plan (Congressional 06 promise) which will reduce the price of gas.

--

“Let us go forth to lead the land we love, asking His blessing and His help, but knowing that here on earth God’s work must truly be our own.”
John F. Kennedy
January 20, 1961

And what policy changes (#101744)
by HankP

did the Dems make to destroy the economy? Please, show your work, as in specific laws passed (over Bush's veto) and how they're to blame for the credit contraction and the popping of the housing bubble.

--

I blame it all on the Internet

there were no changes it was do nothing Congress (#101748)
by Timmy

they failed to move the Trade Pact with Colombia fwd or and confused raising taxes with an energy policy.

--

“Let us go forth to lead the land we love, asking His blessing and His help, but knowing that here on earth God’s work must truly be our own.”
John F. Kennedy
January 20, 1961

I'm sorry, but I have to interject. (#101824)
by Punditus Maximus

There is no expected nontrivial effect from any free trade deal with Colombia. You will find no economic study predicting any noticeable effect. Beliefs to the contrary are articles of faith, not fact.

--

It's impossible to debate if people simply hold beliefs that have no grounding in reality.

I'm sorry, but I have to interject (#101849)
by catchy

that you received a $60 haircut prior to your wedding.

Also, you're telling me that an FTA w. dinky Colombia wouldn't have much effect on our 14 trillion $ GDP?

Back to the brainstorming drawing board.

BZZZZZT (#101753)
by HankP

I'm sorry, that gets an incomplete. No laws cited, off topic reference to Colombian Trade deal and raising taxes with no examples.

Unless you're arguing that we wouldn't be in the position we are in if the Colombian Trade deal was passed? Good for a laugh, but hardly serious.

--

I blame it all on the Internet

where do laws originate? (#101762)
by Timmy

Raising taxes sums up the Dems Energy policy nicely.

--

“Let us go forth to lead the land we love, asking His blessing and His help, but knowing that here on earth God’s work must truly be our own.”
John F. Kennedy
January 20, 1961

Please name the taxes actually raised (#101771)
by HankP

and BTW, "cap and trade" which McCain favors is functionally equivalent to a carbon tax.

--

I blame it all on the Internet

There aren't any wrong answers in brainstorming sessions! (#101759)
by catchy

Unless you're arguing that we wouldn't be in the position we are in if the Colombian Trade deal was passed? Good for a laugh, but hardly serious.

I learned that in a unit on future problem solving in grade school.

This is a new topic, one that hasn't been given a prior moment's thought, and we need a 'safe space' for exploration.

Pls. consider that there were also a lot of D-led Congressional hearings that might have interfered with + stymied the productive capacities of Major League Baseball in the past several yrs.

That mighta hurt payroll #s.

Hey, I gave him an incomplete (#101773)
by HankP

which I thought was pretty fair, considering. There may not be any wrong answers in brainstorming, but you do actually have to give some answers to get the ball rolling.

--

I blame it all on the Internet

I like this brainstorming session (#101751)
by catchy

It's kind of fun to watch conservatives brainstorm on how to blame the D congress for the recession.

If we hash something good out in the diary, someone should shoot a line over to Larry Kudlow.

I mean, failure to pass Latin American FTAs? This is entertaining.

Cut spending, put people back to work, straight talk (#101734)
by catchy

Is this the GoP you're referring to?

I know you've got the opinion that we're fighting the current war(s) to avoid larger ones later.

But the track record of failure is manifest re: the other factors you cite.

cut, cut, cut, cut, McCain is certainly just the man to do it. (#101746)
by Timmy

back to work in real jobs,
straight works for me on certain topics

Exactly, "smaller wars are always better than bigger ones", along with "give Iraq back to its people" and the best geopolitcal leverage with respect to Iran is "a succesful democratic Iraq"

--

“Let us go forth to lead the land we love, asking His blessing and His help, but knowing that here on earth God’s work must truly be our own.”
John F. Kennedy
January 20, 1961

Proper response to what? (#101722)
by M Aurelius

Because it's certainly no response to the fact that McCain is a waffler himself.

--

Of course not!

if he has realigned, he has realigned to my positions (#101732)
by Timmy

Now what was your position on FISA, just for starters.

If Obama runs with the Bush Doctrine and he is certainly trending that way, I'll be happy for two reasons.

I was correct, whereas you (plural) were just foolish.

--

“Let us go forth to lead the land we love, asking His blessing and His help, but knowing that here on earth God’s work must truly be our own.”
John F. Kennedy
January 20, 1961

C'mon, Timmy, Join Me! (#101778)
by Harley

You'd be surprised how easy it is to get thru the day without insulting someone. It's also sorta peaceful. I am filled with sunshine.

Meanwhile, Ambinder makes a good point re Senator Obama:

So his admirers say that one of Barack Obama's most attractive intellectual attributes is his willingness to refine his positions as evidence changes -- he has what occupational psychologists would call "conceptual insight." They contrast this to President Bush's incurious stubborness. Why, then, is the Obama campaign so allergic to the suggestion that, yes, sometimes Obama changes his mind as conditions warrant? Claims of consistency -- which is the hobgoblin of small politics -- just aren't that credible sometimes. And aren't they running against the type of inflexible consistency that they associate with President Bush?

NB: This ponderable does not, at least in my mind, apply to Iraq, where, as I've written, I think Obama's position (although not his emphasis) has been fairly consistent.

--

To think is not enough; you must think of something -- Jules Renard

If Obama rolls over to my position (#101790)
by Timmy

I'll be more than happy. Obama's affirmation of the Bush Doctrine is fine by me but it will have been Bush's leadership which got us there. Harley, please join me in wishing Bush a job well done.

Obama appears to be all for Bush's efforts with respect to FISA, judges and Iraq given his comments last week. All at the top of my agenda. But the diary also focused on Obama's retreat, er confirming his thumb in the wind effort at strategy.

--

“Let us go forth to lead the land we love, asking His blessing and His help, but knowing that here on earth God’s work must truly be our own.”
John F. Kennedy
January 20, 1961

You've listed no positions. (#101776)
by M Aurelius

You merely listed a set of issues.

I was disappointed by Obama on FISA. Big Deal. I expected to be disappointed, which is why I never worshiped the man. I've certainly been let down by McCain, so no difference there.

Obama won't do the bush doctrine where it matters to me: energy, environment, and the court.

I do expect the national security state to continue to further infringe the Constitution. The forces and trends arrayed are vast and long in the making. They certainly precede bush.

--

Of course not!

I've listed five (#101791)
by Timmy

and Obama seeme to be on board with Bush's judges.

--

“Let us go forth to lead the land we love, asking His blessing and His help, but knowing that here on earth God’s work must truly be our own.”
John F. Kennedy
January 20, 1961

Obama voted to filibuster Alito. (#101989)
by Punditus Maximus

Not to, you know, interject reality into the discussion or anything.

--

It's impossible to debate if people simply hold beliefs that have no grounding in reality.

Heh... (#101803)
by M Aurelius

and Obama seeme to be on board with Bush's judges.

Well, if Obama wins, you will see how little truth there is to that statement as soon as he makes his first appointments.

--

Of course not!

So he was dishonest when he talked (#101809)
by Timmy

about recent decisions then.

--

“Let us go forth to lead the land we love, asking His blessing and His help, but knowing that here on earth God’s work must truly be our own.”
John F. Kennedy
January 20, 1961

No. (#101969)
by M Aurelius

Appoint != Consent

--

Of course not!

We had a request from an eminently sensible poster here (#101599)
by catchy

Don't know if you saw it, but Kierk. expressed the worry that name-calling degrades the political discourse on the site.

For your consideration: http://theforvm.org/diary/kierkegaard/a-moratorium-name-calling

Mcsame? (#101602)
by Timmy

comes to mind. Notwithstanding, waffles will continue as it is both apt and descriptive.

--

“Let us go forth to lead the land we love, asking His blessing and His help, but knowing that here on earth God’s work must truly be our own.”
John F. Kennedy
January 20, 1961

Please, continue using it. (#101609)
by M Aurelius

It is indeed both apt and descriptive of the type of content-free politics you practice.

--

Of course not!

plenty of content (#101615)
by Timmy

and actually it has been consistent with respect to liberty, democracy, leverage as well as tolerance.

--

“Let us go forth to lead the land we love, asking His blessing and His help, but knowing that here on earth God’s work must truly be our own.”
John F. Kennedy
January 20, 1961

Yes. Yes, it has. -nt- (#101657)
by Punditus Maximus

.

--

It's impossible to debate if people simply hold beliefs that have no grounding in reality.

apparently crossroads, a Shia led democracy (#101661)
by Timmy

and what is going on in Iran escapes you.

--

“Let us go forth to lead the land we love, asking His blessing and His help, but knowing that here on earth God’s work must truly be our own.”
John F. Kennedy
January 20, 1961

Many of us were hoping 'McSame' would disappear as well (#101608)
by catchy

Pls. note that MScott and Harley have both committed to not using epithets of any sort in the run-up to the election.

You're bucking a trend that could be positive. Why not give it a try and see if things improve round here? Or at least could I make a personal appeal to have you dial things back significantly? (3 of your last 4 diaries have contained 'waffle'.)

Btw, I don't see this as a posting rules issue, I'm just trying to make a case for what I think the majority of the community would prefer. Thanks for your consideration.

Well if Harley has agreed, this will be the last diary (#101612)
by Timmy

where Waffles (or Waffle) will appear.

--

“Let us go forth to lead the land we love, asking His blessing and His help, but knowing that here on earth God’s work must truly be our own.”
John F. Kennedy
January 20, 1961

If Harley can do it, anyone can (#101613)
by catchy
While Harley And I. . . (#101618)
by M Scott Eiland

. . .are both currently in compliance with the terms of the bet, Tomsyl hasn't accepted the spot as the other arbitrator on the panel to make it official--should we try to recruit someone else?

--

I Like to Think of Scott and Myself... (#101670)
by Harley

...as a modern day Mason and Dixon, mapping uncharted territory. WIth better food. And drink. And sports on TV.

--

To think is not enough; you must think of something -- Jules Renard

More like Rowan and Martin nt (#101745)
by HankP

--

I blame it all on the Internet

TOMSYL!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! (#101623)
by catchy

just frickin say 'yes' already.

Now, Now. . . (#101624)
by M Scott Eiland

. . .if he doesn't want to do it, it's up to him. An answer one way or another would be helpful, though.

--

Simply put (#101620)
by Timmy

Waffles was in response to Mcsame, although Waffles was a fairer description.

--

“Let us go forth to lead the land we love, asking His blessing and His help, but knowing that here on earth God’s work must truly be our own.”
John F. Kennedy
January 20, 1961

What's wrong with McWaffle, damnit! (#101639)
by Wagster

I demand equal opprobrium for my insults.

--

More Wagster!

whereas I prefer McCan (#101644)
by Timmy

.

--

“Let us go forth to lead the land we love, asking His blessing and His help, but knowing that here on earth God’s work must truly be our own.”
John F. Kennedy
January 20, 1961

One sin begets another (#101622)
by catchy

establish a rhetorical floor (#101625)
by Timmy

and I'm happy to match it.

--

“Let us go forth to lead the land we love, asking His blessing and His help, but knowing that here on earth God’s work must truly be our own.”
John F. Kennedy
January 20, 1961

nice one re: the edit! (#101707)
by catchy

Will the yelping prevail? (#101597)
by Jordan

It already has. Rightly so -- the Bush folks are reaping the whirlwind that follows massive abuses of trust in a working democracy.

--

Before you criticize someone, you should walk a mile in their shoes. That way when you criticize them, you're a mile away and you have their shoes. -JH

reaping the whirlwind (#101603)
by Timmy

absolutely, a democratic state as well as leverage over Iran.

--

“Let us go forth to lead the land we love, asking His blessing and His help, but knowing that here on earth God’s work must truly be our own.”
John F. Kennedy
January 20, 1961

Yes, that seems to have been the delusion. (#101605)
by Jordan

The reality being a Mideast where we've changed precisely nothing at great expense.

--

Before you criticize someone, you should walk a mile in their shoes. That way when you criticize them, you're a mile away and you have their shoes. -JH

apparently you failed to read the links (#101607)
by Timmy

and missed (well the MSM certainly hasn't covered it) what went on in Anbar.

BTW, whatever happened to that civil war ya all were talking about.

--

“Let us go forth to lead the land we love, asking His blessing and His help, but knowing that here on earth God’s work must truly be our own.”
John F. Kennedy
January 20, 1961

I remain better informed (#101611)
by Jordan

about events in Iraq than the people who decided to terraform that country into a western democracy, but declined to make a plan for what would happen if Iraqis didn't cotton to the idea.

--

Before you criticize someone, you should walk a mile in their shoes. That way when you criticize them, you're a mile away and you have their shoes. -JH

western democracy, naw (#101621)
by Timmy

but a Middle East democracy, yes

--

“Let us go forth to lead the land we love, asking His blessing and His help, but knowing that here on earth God’s work must truly be our own.”
John F. Kennedy
January 20, 1961

Nice euphemism (#101638)
by HankP

as apparently monarchies and dictatorships fall under the rubric of "Middle East democracies".

--

I blame it all on the Internet

It all depends upon on what your definition of democracy is (#101642)
by Timmy

my view is it starts with, we the people and goes from there. You apparently have a different viewpoint, er in line with the Soviet definition.

--

“Let us go forth to lead the land we love, asking His blessing and His help, but knowing that here on earth God’s work must truly be our own.”
John F. Kennedy
January 20, 1961

Uh huh (#101648)
by HankP

just like Jordan and Egypt, right?

--

I blame it all on the Internet

just like the UK (#101650)
by Timmy

and its history of democracy

--

“Let us go forth to lead the land we love, asking His blessing and His help, but knowing that here on earth God’s work must truly be our own.”
John F. Kennedy
January 20, 1961

Links

Conservative
Liberal
Moderate/Mixed/Non-Partisan
Non-Political/Reference

Related Sites -

Polisci Applied (Aaron)
Intrepid Liberal Journal (Intrepid Liberal)
Obsidian Wings (Bird Dog)
Open Hand/Open Eye (locutas)
Red State (Bird Dog)
Swords Crossed (brendanm98)
Wagster Speaks (Wagster)
WatchingAmerica (BlaiseP)
The Social Pathologist (TSP)

Foreign Affairs -

Abu Aardvark
'Aqoul
American Footprints
Council on Foreign Relations
CSIS
Democracy Arsenal
Intel Dump
The Fourth Rail
War and Piece

Politics -

Ace of Spades HQ
Andrew Sullivan
Balloon Juice
Belgravia Dispatch
Captain's Quarters
Crooked Timber
Curmudgeonly & Skeptical
Daily Kos
Democracy Arsenal
Eschaton
Firedoglake
Glenn Greenwald
Global Guerrillas
Hugh Hewitt
Instapundit
Jawa Report
Lawyers, Guns and Money
Liberals Against Terror
Matt Yglesias
Michael J. Totten
Michelle Malkin
Moon of Alabama
New America
OxBlog
Patterico
Political Animal
Political Wire
Publius Pundit
QandO
Reality Based Community
Talking Points Memo
The Agitator
The Belmont Club
The Corner
Truman Project
Winds of Change.net

War -

Counterterrorism Blog
Iraq the Model
Jihad Watch
Small Wars Journal Blog

Economics and Business -

Angry Bear
Brad DeLong
Daniel Drezner
Mahalanobis
Marginal Revolution
Roubini Global Economics
The Big Picture

Science and Tech -

Bad Astronomy
New Scientist
Real Climate
Science Blogs
Scientific American
The Panda's Thumb

Legal -

Balkinization
Conglomerate
Ideoblog
Jurisdynamics
Law and Letters
Overlawyered
ProfessorBainbridge
ScotusBlog
Talk Left
The Becker-Posner Blog
Volokh Conspiracy

Sports -

Baseball Crank
Baseball Musings
Baseball Reference.com
ESPN.com
NFL.com
Only Baseball Matters
The Sports Economist

Books, Film and Music -

Amazon.com
Internet Movie Database
All Music Guide

News and Aggregators -

Asia Times
Boingboing
CNN
Digg
English Russia
Fark
Los Angeles Times
Memeorandum
MSNBC
Politico
Poynteronline
Slashdot
The New York Times
The Washington Post

References -

Wikipedia
Your Dictionary